1.2 sec in total
9 ms
966 ms
240 ms
Visit futuremark.com now to see the best up-to-date Futuremark content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about futuremark.com
Home of the world's best benchmarks and most popular performance tests including 3DMark, PCMark, Servermark, and VRMark. Get started with free downloads.
Visit futuremark.comWe analyzed Futuremark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 9 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
futuremark.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
31/100
10%
Value7.4 s
4/100
25%
Value4.3 s
76/100
10%
Value810 ms
36/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.5 s
48/100
10%
9 ms
13 ms
200 ms
26 ms
38 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Futuremark.com, 16% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (471 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 424.7 kB (31%)
1.4 MB
938.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Futuremark.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 844.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.5 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Futuremark images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 213.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 213.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 168.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Futuremark.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 168.9 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (48%)
27
14
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Futuremark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
futuremark.com
9 ms
www.futuremark.com
13 ms
css
200 ms
40UCy4fsYNYArSGoFjCduXzeQBouJXcdlO1LsUV9mN2.css
26 ms
yZ4MdRJ5KQzKzeJ9Ubq1kcCPHP8tLMNmoyQGYJw2m2i.js
38 ms
oAT3WLfAF2PfhQQHuXTUG3FgKYqZGqochtzqTL54pUw.js
7 ms
DoA4ZGf7FjTpqqXqAJ1HRjOluQVwVMS96NC1AYQzCRK.js
35 ms
googleplus.png
78 ms
forumlatestpostsfeed
73 ms
twitter.png
44 ms
fb.png
46 ms
futuremark-logo.png
45 ms
li.png
45 ms
bg-gdc2016-dcdcdc.jpg
48 ms
gdc-2016-logo.png
45 ms
bgr_3dmark_pcmark8_bundle.jpg
50 ms
arrow.png
46 ms
arrowleft.png
46 ms
3dmark-new-cb.png
51 ms
pcmark8-cb.png
49 ms
pcmark-android-cb.jpg
48 ms
external.png
47 ms
ul-logo-40.png
47 ms
s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
246 ms
EFpQQyG9GqCrobXxL-KRMfEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
312 ms
nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf
410 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
429 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
456 ms
4cKlrioa77J2iqTqBgkRWg.ttf
471 ms
analytics.js
106 ms
overlay.png
17 ms
border.png
17 ms
controls.png
17 ms
bubble16.png
11 ms
collect
57 ms
collect
270 ms
ga-audiences
229 ms
futuremark.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
futuremark.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
futuremark.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Futuremark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Futuremark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
futuremark.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Futuremark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: