Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

174 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

313 ms

my.fishtrack.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to my.fishtrack.com homepage info - get ready to check My Fishtrack best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about my.fishtrack.com

Premium Upgrade Funnel

Visit my.fishtrack.com

Key Findings

We analyzed My.fishtrack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 174 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

my.fishtrack.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.7 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

41/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,710 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.164

72/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.7 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

my.fishtrack.com

174 ms

www.fishtrack.com

288 ms

ftmp_03302015.css

68 ms

global_styles_04172015.css

154 ms

font-awesome.min.css

6 ms

Our browser made a total of 114 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original My.fishtrack.com, 30% (34 requests) were made to I.cdn-surfline.com and 11% (12 requests) were made to E.cdn-fishtrack.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (298 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.optimizely.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 433.6 kB (19%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

In fact, the total size of My.fishtrack.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 76.7 kB

  • Original 97.8 kB
  • After minification 87.5 kB
  • After compression 21.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.3 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.7 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 48.5 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. My Fishtrack images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 208.7 kB

  • Original 369.2 kB
  • After minification 347.6 kB
  • After compression 160.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 208.7 kB or 57% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 99.8 kB

  • Original 119.3 kB
  • After minification 103.6 kB
  • After compression 19.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. My.fishtrack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 99.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (43%)

Requests Now

98

After Optimization

56

The browser has sent 98 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of My Fishtrack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

my.fishtrack.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

my.fishtrack.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

my.fishtrack.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8;

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise My.fishtrack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that My.fishtrack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8;. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of My Fishtrack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: