Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

134 ms

Resources Loaded

888 ms

Page Rendered

95 ms

proposals.fluidtreatmentsystems.com screenshot

About Website

Visit proposals.fluidtreatmentsystems.com now to see the best up-to-date Proposals Fluidtreatmentsystems content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about proposals.fluidtreatmentsystems.com

Visit proposals.fluidtreatmentsystems.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Proposals.fluidtreatmentsystems.com page load time and found that the first response time was 134 ms and then it took 983 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

proposals.fluidtreatmentsystems.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

proposals.fluidtreatmentsystems.com

134 ms

159 ms

reset.css

25 ms

admin.bundle.css

88 ms

jquery-1.4.4.min.js

70 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Proposals.fluidtreatmentsystems.com, 11% (1 request) were made to Google-analytics.com and 11% (1 request) were made to Quoteroller-live.s3.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (445 ms) relates to the external source Appcenter.intuit.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 333.8 kB (76%)

Content Size

436.9 kB

After Optimization

103.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Proposals.fluidtreatmentsystems.com main page is 436.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 254.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 5.4 kB
  • After minification 4.2 kB
  • After compression 1.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.2 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.7 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 11.9 kB
  • After minification 10.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Proposals Fluidtreatmentsystems needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.7 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 110.9 kB

  • Original 164.7 kB
  • After minification 154.4 kB
  • After compression 53.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 110.9 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 217.4 kB

  • Original 254.9 kB
  • After minification 254.4 kB
  • After compression 37.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Proposals.fluidtreatmentsystems.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 217.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

7

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Proposals Fluidtreatmentsystems. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

SEO Factors

proposals.fluidtreatmentsystems.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Proposals.fluidtreatmentsystems.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Proposals.fluidtreatmentsystems.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Proposals Fluidtreatmentsystems. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: