3.4 sec in total
37 ms
2.9 sec
434 ms
Welcome to rankings.ft.com homepage info - get ready to check Rankings FT best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about rankings.ft.com
Business school rankings, including MBA, MSC, and European MBA rankings from the Financial Times
Visit rankings.ft.comWe analyzed Rankings.ft.com page load time and found that the first response time was 37 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
rankings.ft.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
33/100
10%
Value11.6 s
0/100
25%
Value9.7 s
11/100
10%
Value2,320 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.21
59/100
15%
Value15.4 s
7/100
10%
37 ms
12 ms
19 ms
15 ms
19 ms
Our browser made a total of 121 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 16% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Rankings.ft.com, 12% (15 requests) were made to Im.ft-static.com and 7% (8 requests) were made to S2.ft-static.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Rankings.ft.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (70%)
1.7 MB
505.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Rankings.ft.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 77.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.5 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rankings FT needs image optimization as it can save up to 10.0 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 893.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 893.8 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 185.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rankings.ft.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 185.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 73 (66%)
111
38
The browser has sent 111 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rankings FT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 45 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rankings
37 ms
core.css
12 ms
style.min.css
19 ms
nonArticle.css
15 ms
opentag-27295-31253.js
19 ms
renderHead.js
68 ms
tracking.js
67 ms
brightcove.js
67 ms
falcon.css
16 ms
alljavascript
97 ms
urchin.js
69 ms
coreFoot.js
66 ms
nonArticleFoot.js
66 ms
script.min.js
64 ms
conversion.js
67 ms
ads.js
24 ms
social.js
23 ms
randm.js
460 ms
mmcore.js
33 ms
polyfill.min.js
60 ms
js
57 ms
css
17 ms
js
36 ms
52 ms
px.gif
199 ms
Livefyre.js
46 ms
track.gif
221 ms
advertising-ft-13.0.0.min.js
13 ms
advertising-ft-13.0.0.min.css
12 ms
Livefyre.min.js
84 ms
gpt.js
67 ms
controltag
104 ms
service
66 ms
masthead_small.gif
40 ms
rss-icon.gif
33 ms
handsLaptopcreditDreamstime.jpg
420 ms
search.gif
33 ms
13610332-a3fd-11e0-8b4f-00144feabdc0.img
34 ms
specialreportimage
895 ms
featured.gif
44 ms
specialreportimage
1196 ms
specialreportimage
905 ms
specialreportimage
908 ms
specialreportimage
33 ms
specialreportimage
1161 ms
specialreportimage
1024 ms
specialreportimage
1785 ms
specialreportimage
1793 ms
masthead_print.gif
32 ms
blank.gif
36 ms
shadow-9x9.png
33 ms
d6d400be-7c2b-11e2-99f0-00144feabdc0.img
34 ms
267ceea8-df6f-483c-9714-62e4d2d685e7.img
64 ms
a000bffc-7f8e-11e3-94d2-00144feabdc0.img
33 ms
7a358e9c-fb25-11e4-9aed-00144feab7de.img
37 ms
96bd906e-217c-11e5-ab0f-6bb9974f25d0.img
37 ms
aa47d0a2-24c6-11e5-9c4e-a775d2b173ca.img
38 ms
ea444f82-01cc-11df-b8cb-00144feabdc0.img
40 ms
cookieConsent-min.js
37 ms
8ab1e348-0a8a-11e3-9cec-00144feabdc0.jpg
37 ms
arrows.png
23 ms
pubads_impl_81.js
60 ms
px.gif
124 ms
dot.gif
45 ms
px.gif
137 ms
controltag.js.3269b976cac0388f80dbfdb09d96a4e7
71 ms
track.gif
279 ms
railBg.gif
32 ms
container.html
12 ms
button_sprite.png
741 ms
px.gif
83 ms
BrightcoveExperiences.js
55 ms
track.gif
208 ms
tabs-bg.gif
677 ms
falconbetabadge.png
679 ms
falconsprite.png
682 ms
navigation_sprite.png
684 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
upgrade_flash_player2.gif
6 ms
76 ms
107 ms
engage.js
101 ms
px.gif
154 ms
px.gif
128 ms
px.gif
165 ms
px.gif
167 ms
ads
99 ms
track.gif
198 ms
chartbeat_ad.js
58 ms
76 ms
activityi;src=4235225;type=homeo886;cat=ft-ho780;u7=USA;u5=1;u1=;u10=MS41MTIuNzAxNTUyMzYxMjQ5OS4xNDU2Nzg3MTg5MjExLmVkYjU0ZDE_*;ord=1;num=5460679037496.447
75 ms
login
17 ms
providers.css
44 ms
ads
55 ms
ad
51 ms
ping
38 ms
fbds.js
47 ms
tre
54 ms
trackconversion.js
54 ms
adperf_launch_1.0.0_scrambled.js
69 ms
campaign_tracker.js
19 ms
ads
41 ms
osd.js
14 ms
41 ms
tag2
171 ms
ads
47 ms
trackconversion
17 ms
13 ms
dispatch.fcgi
182 ms
dispatch.fcgi
185 ms
adperf_core_1.0.0_scrambled.js
40 ms
menu_close.gif
22 ms
ajax-loader.gif
198 ms
728x90_Business-Ranking.gif
273 ms
oba_DEFAULT.png
57 ms
300x250_Business-Ranking.gif
299 ms
ad
4 ms
ad
5 ms
optout_check
68 ms
get
82 ms
js
17 ms
rankings.ft.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
rankings.ft.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
rankings.ft.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rankings.ft.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rankings.ft.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rankings.ft.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rankings FT. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: