4 sec in total
956 ms
2.3 sec
810 ms
Visit static.foodgawker.com now to see the best up-to-date Static Foodgawker content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about static.foodgawker.com
Come feed your eyes! Discover, search and share the best food blogger recipes.
Visit static.foodgawker.comWe analyzed Static.foodgawker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 956 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
static.foodgawker.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
49/100
10%
Value8.6 s
1/100
25%
Value8.1 s
21/100
10%
Value1,020 ms
26/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value16.8 s
5/100
10%
956 ms
30 ms
65 ms
155 ms
227 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 24% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Static.foodgawker.com, 17% (11 requests) were made to Photo2.foodgawker.com and 17% (11 requests) were made to Photo.foodgawker.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (956 ms) belongs to the original domain Static.foodgawker.com.
Page size can be reduced by 737.7 kB (23%)
3.1 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Static.foodgawker.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 89.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Static Foodgawker images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 470.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 470.8 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 132.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Static.foodgawker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 132.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (13%)
63
55
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Static Foodgawker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
static.foodgawker.com
956 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
30 ms
5c8b1642f3e1e4d51910832ef73311b6.73c8c306a4812e8a1a734c0027b7b62d.css
65 ms
537b609334dda0c2739d8713bcbf3ed6.a87daf404a998e14886216d065ac859f.js
155 ms
gpt.js
227 ms
gpt_mobile.js
342 ms
ga.js
342 ms
2603900.jpg
455 ms
2603872.jpg
510 ms
2603910.jpg
493 ms
2603982.jpg
503 ms
2603954.jpg
502 ms
2604102.jpg
531 ms
2603970.jpg
531 ms
2604104.jpg
518 ms
2604204.jpg
530 ms
2604108.jpg
556 ms
2604184.jpg
556 ms
2604220.jpg
570 ms
header-repeat_6-7-13.jpg
293 ms
retina-icons.png
337 ms
fg-logo_6-7-13.png
293 ms
sprite-a.20140610.png
361 ms
card-hover-top.png
361 ms
card-hover-btm.png
374 ms
addthis-blank.gif
396 ms
2603894.jpg
500 ms
2603938.jpg
500 ms
2604094.jpg
498 ms
2604082.jpg
496 ms
2604084.jpg
486 ms
2604048.jpg
514 ms
2604247.jpg
525 ms
2604060.jpg
547 ms
2603862.jpg
524 ms
2604202.jpg
551 ms
footer-texture.jpg
231 ms
Lato-Regular-webfont.woff
232 ms
Lato-Bold-webfont.woff
230 ms
footer-bar-texture.jpg
251 ms
quant.js
186 ms
loading-bar.gif
197 ms
242 ms
pubads_impl_82.js
120 ms
__utm.gif
46 ms
__utm.gif
54 ms
pixel;r=134764541;a=p-ac23cN1QUP2Is;fpan=1;fpa=P0-1683495404-1458505764386;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1458505764385;tzo=-180;ref=;url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.foodgawker.com%2F;ogl=site_name.foodgawker%2Ctitle.foodgawker%2Ctype.blog%2Curl.https%3A%2F%2Ffoodgawker%252Ecom%2Cdescription.feed%20your%20eyes
123 ms
container.html
51 ms
ads
356 ms
232833.jpg
318 ms
232843.jpg
280 ms
66603.jpg
292 ms
66625.jpg
249 ms
66609.jpg
295 ms
66621.jpg
285 ms
66613.jpg
329 ms
232841.jpg
286 ms
232845.jpg
313 ms
232847.jpg
327 ms
66601.jpg
207 ms
66619.jpg
259 ms
66607.jpg
294 ms
232821.jpg
318 ms
232835.jpg
325 ms
232829.jpg
325 ms
osd.js
27 ms
static.foodgawker.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
static.foodgawker.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
static.foodgawker.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Static.foodgawker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Static.foodgawker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
static.foodgawker.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Static Foodgawker. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: