Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 43% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 73

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

795 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

103 ms

webmail.faap.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Webmail Faap content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webmail.faap.net

Visit webmail.faap.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Webmail.faap.net page load time and found that the first response time was 795 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webmail.faap.net performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.5 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.2 s

32/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webmail.faap.net

795 ms

login.css

257 ms

login.jpg

770 ms

Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Webmail.faap.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (795 ms) belongs to the original domain Webmail.faap.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 18.6 kB (29%)

Content Size

64.3 kB

After Optimization

45.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Webmail.faap.net main page is 64.3 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 59.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 2.9 kB
  • After minification 2.3 kB
  • After compression 921 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 614 B, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.0 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 15.5 kB

  • Original 59.7 kB
  • After minification 44.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Webmail Faap needs image optimization as it can save up to 15.5 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 1.7 kB
  • After minification 1.3 kB
  • After compression 480 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webmail.faap.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.2 kB or 71% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webmail Faap. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

webmail.faap.net accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

webmail.faap.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

webmail.faap.net SEO score

73

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webmail.faap.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Webmail.faap.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Webmail Faap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: