2.3 sec in total
196 ms
1.9 sec
249 ms
Visit brownstock.gigantic.com now to see the best up-to-date Brownstock Gigantic content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about brownstock.gigantic.com
Visit brownstock.gigantic.comWe analyzed Brownstock.gigantic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 196 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
brownstock.gigantic.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.7 s
92/100
10%
Value3.1 s
74/100
25%
Value1.7 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.473
18/100
15%
Value1.7 s
100/100
10%
196 ms
139 ms
22 ms
258 ms
260 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Brownstock.gigantic.com, 61% (57 requests) were made to Brownstock.co.uk and 12% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Brownstock.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (78%)
2.6 MB
559.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Brownstock.gigantic.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 78.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Brownstock Gigantic needs image optimization as it can save up to 78.5 kB or 40% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 707.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 707.4 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Brownstock.gigantic.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 91% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 71 (91%)
78
7
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Brownstock Gigantic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
brownstock.gigantic.com
196 ms
brownstock-festival-tickets
139 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
22 ms
styles.css
258 ms
settings.css
260 ms
css
60 ms
css
61 ms
public.css
264 ms
css
62 ms
bootstrap.css
348 ms
animate.css
263 ms
prettyPhoto.css
266 ms
extralayers.css
336 ms
flexslider.css
342 ms
menu-css.css
362 ms
owl.carousel.css
362 ms
responsive.css
363 ms
revslider.css
420 ms
style.css
507 ms
css
58 ms
js_composer.css
599 ms
www.brownstock.co.uk
492 ms
sharebar.css
440 ms
jquery.min.js
55 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
732 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
826 ms
jq-sticky-anything.min.js
521 ms
public.js
572 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
49 ms
sharebar.js
584 ms
panopress.js
690 ms
panopress.css
652 ms
conversion.js
49 ms
jquery.form.min.js
668 ms
scripts.js
676 ms
stickThis.js
749 ms
bootstrap.js
919 ms
countdown.js
758 ms
custom-portfolio.js
769 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
810 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
899 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
947 ms
portfolio_wrapper.js
868 ms
jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js
898 ms
masonry-portfolio.js
912 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
1019 ms
dc.js
30 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
menu_min.js
740 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
814 ms
textrotate.js
738 ms
jquery-ui.js
1070 ms
jquery.jigowatt.js
756 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
737 ms
custom.js
740 ms
scripts.js
743 ms
core.min.js
753 ms
comment-reply.min.js
793 ms
wp-embed.min.js
795 ms
js_composer_front.js
737 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
747 ms
css
15 ms
css
13 ms
css
14 ms
fbds.js
38 ms
44 ms
bg.png
630 ms
unnamed-4.png
380 ms
fb.png
381 ms
insta.png
387 ms
twitter.png
412 ms
social18-2.png
470 ms
BSTK-2016-head-tix.png
633 ms
arrow.png
469 ms
analytics.js
34 ms
BfQP1MR3mJNaumtWa4Tizg.ttf
44 ms
zR-6QGMCFX5j-6nbH_HpIQ.ttf
76 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
80 ms
_dCzxpXzIS3sL-gdJWAP8A.ttf
97 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8y3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
79 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
80 ms
RJMlAoFXXQEzZoMSUteGWKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
79 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12by3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
77 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
79 ms
1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
80 ms
PKCRbVvRfd5n7BTjtGiFZC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
80 ms
118 ms
63 ms
collect
35 ms
collect
61 ms
fbevents.js
118 ms
21 ms
21 ms
brownstock.gigantic.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
brownstock.gigantic.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Page has valid source maps
brownstock.gigantic.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Brownstock.gigantic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Brownstock.gigantic.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
brownstock.gigantic.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Brownstock Gigantic. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: