Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    22% of websites

gadgetwe.com

GadgetWE | High Quality Gadget for World Everyone

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

614 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

276 ms

gadgetwe.com screenshot

About Website

Visit gadgetwe.com now to see the best up-to-date GadgetWE content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gadgetwe.com

High Quality Gadget for World Everyone

Visit gadgetwe.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gadgetwe.com page load time and found that the first response time was 614 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gadgetwe.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

62/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.7 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,110 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.7 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gadgetwe.com

614 ms

screen.css

71 ms

default.css

117 ms

jquery.js

201 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

142 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Gadgetwe.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 5% (3 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (614 ms) belongs to the original domain Gadgetwe.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 406.0 kB (59%)

Content Size

685.1 kB

After Optimization

279.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Gadgetwe.com main page is 685.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 517.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 57.6 kB

  • Original 77.8 kB
  • After minification 75.4 kB
  • After compression 20.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.6 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 576 B

  • Original 48.4 kB
  • After minification 47.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GadgetWE images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 314.6 kB

  • Original 517.4 kB
  • After minification 517.3 kB
  • After compression 202.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 314.6 kB or 61% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 33.2 kB

  • Original 41.6 kB
  • After minification 35.2 kB
  • After compression 8.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gadgetwe.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 33.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (46%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

30

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GadgetWE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

gadgetwe.com accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

gadgetwe.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

gadgetwe.com SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gadgetwe.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gadgetwe.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of GadgetWE. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: