Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

gap-gap.com

エックスサーバー サーバー初期ページ

Page Load Speed

11 sec in total

First Response

1.7 sec

Resources Loaded

4.8 sec

Page Rendered

4.5 sec

gap-gap.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Gap content for Japan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gap-gap.com

馬券研究家として著書もある竹内の最強の配信コンテンツ。1年間の無料公開を経てついに正式サービス開始。投資競馬の決定版。

Visit gap-gap.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gap-gap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 9.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gap-gap.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.1 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.1 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gap-gap.com

1724 ms

styles.css

350 ms

takeuchi.jpg

725 ms

p-san.jpg

373 ms

likebox.php

273 ms

Our browser made a total of 184 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Gap-gap.com, 13% (24 requests) were made to Ecx.images-amazon.com and 13% (23 requests) were made to Fls-fe.amazon-adsystem.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Gap-gap.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 693.9 kB (25%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Gap-gap.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 108.9 kB

  • Original 130.3 kB
  • After minification 125.0 kB
  • After compression 21.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 108.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 189.5 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gap images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 137.9 kB

  • Original 212.7 kB
  • After minification 212.6 kB
  • After compression 74.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 137.9 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 257.7 kB

  • Original 308.6 kB
  • After minification 295.6 kB
  • After compression 51.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gap-gap.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 257.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 61 (34%)

Requests Now

179

After Optimization

118

The browser has sent 179 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

gap-gap.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

gap-gap.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

gap-gap.com SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gap-gap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gap-gap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: