28.8 sec in total
6 sec
22.6 sec
145 ms
Welcome to gap.web.id homepage info - get ready to check Gap best content right away, or after learning these important things about gap.web.id
Berbagi Ilmu yang bermanfaat
Visit gap.web.idWe analyzed Gap.web.id page load time and found that the first response time was 6 sec and then it took 22.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
gap.web.id performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
6/100
10%
Value13.4 s
0/100
25%
Value31.0 s
0/100
10%
Value57,550 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value74.7 s
0/100
10%
5998 ms
9383 ms
958 ms
5477 ms
112 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Gap.web.id, 9% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com and 9% (3 requests) were made to I1.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (12.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Gap.web.id.
Page size can be reduced by 305.9 kB (69%)
446.4 kB
140.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Gap.web.id main page is 446.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 305.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 11.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.8 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gap images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 213.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 213.6 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 80.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gap.web.id needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 80.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (78%)
27
6
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gap.web.id
5998 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
9383 ms
styles.css
958 ms
style.css
5477 ms
css
112 ms
font-awesome.css
11055 ms
jetpack.css
6210 ms
jquery.js
12949 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
5690 ms
jquery.cycle.js
6918 ms
slideshow-shortcode.js
7270 ms
photon.js
5214 ms
jquery.form.min.js
8623 ms
scripts.js
7767 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
5 ms
gprofiles.js
56 ms
wpgroho.js
7978 ms
masonry.min.js
12101 ms
bootstrap.js
9718 ms
theme.js
8480 ms
wp-embed.min.js
10343 ms
e-201614.js
6 ms
asus1.jpg
2014 ms
how-to-use-nagios-to-monitor-hyper-v.png
5447 ms
asus.jpg
2009 ms
LAMP.jpg
4951 ms
no-image.jpg
3838 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
7 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12bxsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
23 ms
1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
23 ms
hovercard.css
32 ms
services.css
65 ms
g.gif
30 ms
gap.web.id accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
gap.web.id best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
gap.web.id SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ID
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gap.web.id can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Gap.web.id main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gap.web.id
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gap. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: