Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

gap.web.id

Noted n Learn | Berbagi Ilmu yang bermanfaat

Page Load Speed

28.8 sec in total

First Response

6 sec

Resources Loaded

22.6 sec

Page Rendered

145 ms

gap.web.id screenshot

About Website

Welcome to gap.web.id homepage info - get ready to check Gap best content right away, or after learning these important things about gap.web.id

Berbagi Ilmu yang bermanfaat

Visit gap.web.id

Key Findings

We analyzed Gap.web.id page load time and found that the first response time was 6 sec and then it took 22.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gap.web.id performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value31.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value57,550 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value74.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gap.web.id

5998 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

9383 ms

styles.css

958 ms

style.css

5477 ms

css

112 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Gap.web.id, 9% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com and 9% (3 requests) were made to I1.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (12.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Gap.web.id.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 305.9 kB (69%)

Content Size

446.4 kB

After Optimization

140.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Gap.web.id main page is 446.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 305.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 11.8 kB

  • Original 16.0 kB
  • After minification 15.1 kB
  • After compression 4.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.8 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 26.3 kB
  • After minification 26.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gap images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 213.6 kB

  • Original 305.8 kB
  • After minification 270.8 kB
  • After compression 92.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 213.6 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 80.4 kB

  • Original 98.4 kB
  • After minification 91.3 kB
  • After compression 17.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gap.web.id needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 80.4 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (78%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

6

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

gap.web.id accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

gap.web.id best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

gap.web.id SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ID

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gap.web.id can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Gap.web.id main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gap. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: