10.3 sec in total
891 ms
8.9 sec
505 ms
Visit garpia.ru now to see the best up-to-date Garpia content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about garpia.ru
Привет тебе, путник, от старой перечницы! Раз ты зашёл сюда, то, наверное, тебе это зачем-то нужно. Или не нужно. Может быть ты просто заблудился, гуляя по просторам рунета. В любом случае я рада, что...
Visit garpia.ruWe analyzed Garpia.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 891 ms and then it took 9.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
garpia.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value5.4 s
20/100
25%
Value10.3 s
8/100
10%
Value250 ms
84/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value10.9 s
21/100
10%
891 ms
167 ms
187 ms
311 ms
455 ms
Our browser made a total of 109 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Garpia.ru, 11% (12 requests) were made to Money.yandex.ru and 4% (4 requests) were made to Acint.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.8 sec) relates to the external source Money.yandex.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 704.9 kB (56%)
1.3 MB
558.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Garpia.ru main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 444.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 101.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 101.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 83.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Garpia needs image optimization as it can save up to 83.8 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 293.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 293.7 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 226.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Garpia.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 226.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (51%)
103
50
The browser has sent 103 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Garpia. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
garpia.ru
891 ms
style.css
167 ms
jquery.min.js
187 ms
tab.js
311 ms
openapi.js
455 ms
wp-filebase.css
737 ms
wp_calendar.css
835 ms
postratings-css.css
678 ms
nggallery.css
903 ms
jquery.js
697 ms
comment-reply.min.js
405 ms
jquery.ui.datepicker-ru.js
893 ms
jquery.ui.datepicker.js
1954 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
835 ms
ngg.slideshow.min.js
847 ms
menu.css
932 ms
client.css
974 ms
lightbox.css
969 ms
prototype.js
1463 ms
effects.js
1685 ms
lightbox.js
1353 ms
trackbar.js
1257 ms
wp-page-numbers.css
1103 ms
bela-default.css
1243 ms
recent.php
514 ms
pinit.js
116 ms
postratings-js.js
1405 ms
wp_calendar.js
1398 ms
css
143 ms
css
174 ms
3_0_EFEFEFFF_EFEFEFFF_0_pageviews
256 ms
tic-pr-tub-7.png
63 ms
bg.png
1483 ms
name.png
1337 ms
line-up.png
1653 ms
chibik.png
1648 ms
3447__180x9999_245.jpg
1559 ms
3469__180x9999_screenshot12.jpg
1743 ms
1427__180x9999_2.jpg
1748 ms
3385__180x9999_188.jpg
1648 ms
vk.png
1709 ms
fb.png
1741 ms
pin.png
1764 ms
insta.png
2117 ms
tw.png
1819 ms
icon1.png
1867 ms
thumbs_63.jpg
1868 ms
thumbs_61.jpg
1887 ms
sdk.js
327 ms
thumbs_39.jpg
1709 ms
thumbs_38.jpg
1899 ms
thumbs_55.jpg
1756 ms
thumbs_36.jpg
1655 ms
147 ms
thumbs_54.jpg
2691 ms
xd_arbiter.php
293 ms
xd_arbiter.php
1173 ms
thumbs_60.jpg
1731 ms
thumbs_43.jpg
1854 ms
thumbs_66.jpg
1698 ms
thumbs_62.jpg
1783 ms
thumbs_dsc_0012.jpg
1903 ms
ajax-processing.gif
1755 ms
line-down.png
1648 ms
ga.js
138 ms
line-menu.png
895 ms
line.png
915 ms
clock.png
937 ms
tag.png
912 ms
cat.png
1104 ms
comments.png
1101 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xNDLSy1PIjjNvoQ-H5eYV74.ttf
159 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xHEHffx_y3ihZ-lRogfrVBY.ttf
199 ms
aci.js
269 ms
small.xml
1446 ms
small.xml
3465 ms
mglass.png
1023 ms
bg-footer.png
1091 ms
2401347.js
330 ms
hit
319 ms
watch.js
1 ms
aci.js
288 ms
admin-ajax.php
1527 ms
rating_over.gif
990 ms
arrow-new.png
1129 ms
arrow-new2.png
1146 ms
__utm.gif
75 ms
pinit_main.js
75 ms
129 ms
293 ms
hit
198 ms
346 ms
match
276 ms
hotlog_redirects
272 ms
_money.css
714 ms
_lego.css
539 ms
_old-site.css
2708 ms
jquery.min.js
228 ms
_money.en.js
2902 ms
lodash.min.js
272 ms
_old-site.en.js
3814 ms
_lego.js
705 ms
_messages.en.js
143 ms
b-widget-button.css
2292 ms
b-widget-button__sprite.png
395 ms
b-widget-button__icon_type_yamoney.png
193 ms
b-widget-button__icon_type_any-card.png
200 ms
loading.gif
171 ms
closelabel.gif
187 ms
garpia.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
garpia.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
garpia.ru SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Garpia.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Garpia.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
garpia.ru
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Garpia. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: