7.4 sec in total
2.3 sec
4.9 sec
270 ms
Welcome to gdcc.com homepage info - get ready to check GDCC best content right away, or after learning these important things about gdcc.com
A Global Data Collection Company for telephone interviews and CATI services, providing market research for the consumer and business sectors.
Visit gdcc.comWe analyzed Gdcc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
gdcc.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.4 s
0/100
10%
Value14.5 s
0/100
25%
Value10.4 s
8/100
10%
Value1,820 ms
9/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value19.3 s
2/100
10%
2298 ms
29 ms
452 ms
353 ms
30 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Gdcc.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Gdcc.com.
Page size can be reduced by 205.5 kB (27%)
754.9 kB
549.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Gdcc.com main page is 754.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 544.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 11.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.8 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 59.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, GDCC needs image optimization as it can save up to 59.0 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 103.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 103.7 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gdcc.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 31.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (57%)
42
18
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GDCC. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gdcc.com
2298 ms
css
29 ms
screen.css
452 ms
modernizr-2.0.6.min.js
353 ms
jquery.min.js
30 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
36 ms
theme-my-login.css
177 ms
styles.css
204 ms
social_widget.css
178 ms
youtube-shortcode.css
188 ms
admin-ajax.php
1811 ms
style.css
354 ms
subscribe-download.js
278 ms
jquery.form.min.js
475 ms
scripts.js
350 ms
wp-embed.min.js
349 ms
plugins.js
362 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
545 ms
scripts.js
376 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
180 ms
ga.js
80 ms
header-bg-plus-repeater.png
104 ms
istanbul.jpg
807 ms
rotterdam.jpg
809 ms
header-bg-plus.png
350 ms
logo.png
350 ms
footer-bg.png
363 ms
aimri_footer.png
202 ms
esomar_footer.png
303 ms
iso_footer.png
393 ms
mra_footer.png
442 ms
nebu_footer.png
442 ms
bhbia_footer.png
452 ms
wapor_footer.png
826 ms
footer-bg-repeater.jpg
529 ms
gb.png
541 ms
nl.png
542 ms
de.png
618 ms
fr.png
631 ms
tr.png
632 ms
linkedin.png
708 ms
facebook.png
752 ms
__utm.gif
40 ms
gdcc.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
gdcc.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gdcc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gdcc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gdcc.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of GDCC. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: