Tools & Wizards About Us
gdjam.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 50

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

gdjam.com

华体会登录(中国)官方网站IOS/安卓通用版/手机APP下载

Page Load Speed

6 sec in total

First Response

1 sec

Resources Loaded

4.8 sec

Page Rendered

124 ms

gdjam.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to gdjam.com homepage info - get ready to check Gdjam best content right away, or after learning these important things about gdjam.com

华体会登录

Visit gdjam.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gdjam.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gdjam.com performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

53/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.7 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.0 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gdjam.com

1045 ms

250 ms

css

28 ms

ghost.min.css

297 ms

qrcode_430.jpg

3542 ms

Our browser made a total of 8 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 38% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Gdjam.com, 38% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 13% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) relates to the external source 7xpehp.com1.z0.glb.clouddn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 kB (5%)

Content Size

25.0 kB

After Optimization

23.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Gdjam.com main page is 25.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 22.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 2.1 kB
  • After minification 1.5 kB
  • After compression 862 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 562 B, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.2 kB or 59% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 22.9 kB
  • After minification 22.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gdjam images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

3

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 3 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gdjam. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

gdjam.com

gdjam.com

1045 ms

250 ms

css

css

28 ms

ghost.min.css

ghost.min.css

297 ms

qrcode_430.jpg

qrcode_430.jpg

3542 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

19 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

16 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

16 ms

Accessibility Review

gdjam.com accessibility score

50

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

gdjam.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

gdjam.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gdjam.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Gdjam.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gdjam.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gdjam. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: