3.5 sec in total
351 ms
2.5 sec
616 ms
Welcome to gedfr.co homepage info - get ready to check Gedfr best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about gedfr.co
gedfr.co
Visit gedfr.coWe analyzed Gedfr.co page load time and found that the first response time was 351 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
gedfr.co performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
70/100
10%
Value3.8 s
55/100
25%
Value3.8 s
84/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.121
84/100
15%
Value3.5 s
92/100
10%
351 ms
182 ms
393 ms
384 ms
641 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Gedfr.co, 21% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Accounts.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Gedfr.co.
Page size can be reduced by 116.4 kB (13%)
923.5 kB
807.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Gedfr.co main page is 923.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 803.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 8.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.6 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 38.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gedfr images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 68.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 68.4 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gedfr.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.3 kB or 73% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (24%)
34
26
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gedfr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
gedfr.co
351 ms
wpstyles.css
182 ms
jquery.js
393 ms
wp9d2ca1ee_06.png
384 ms
wpa7d9c412_06.png
641 ms
wp4356fcc5_06.png
246 ms
wpe358bcac_06.png
749 ms
wpa603a089_06.png
340 ms
wpb1746ed5_06.png
224 ms
wp17bba385_06.png
304 ms
wp22180bc5_06.png
608 ms
wp4b7dd062_06.png
482 ms
wpd06b21de_06.png
431 ms
wp9c22c9b1_06.png
470 ms
wpdb9898b6_06.png
520 ms
wpc7840695_06.png
563 ms
wp9853e2af_06.png
571 ms
wp00f3afc3_06.png
607 ms
wp4e2c03db_06.png
657 ms
wp64bd12eb_06.png
661 ms
wp1611b0dd_05_06.jpg
690 ms
wp16771e88_06.png
770 ms
wpc32b0acb_06.png
720 ms
wp1e78dc49_06.png
744 ms
wp9f3fd5bb_06.png
742 ms
plusone.js
70 ms
wp66d17504.ttf
907 ms
wpf62d846d.ttf
1747 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
36 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
35 ms
fastbutton
105 ms
postmessageRelay
104 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
36 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
29 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
92 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
51 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
33 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
4 ms
gedfr.co accessibility score
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
gedfr.co best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
gedfr.co SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gedfr.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed French language. Our system also found out that Gedfr.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gedfr.co
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gedfr. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: