3.1 sec in total
173 ms
2.2 sec
641 ms
Click here to check amazing Gee Paw Hill content for Portugal. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about geepawhill.org
Visit geepawhill.orgWe analyzed Geepawhill.org page load time and found that the first response time was 173 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
geepawhill.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value9.2 s
1/100
25%
Value7.0 s
32/100
10%
Value2,330 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.057
98/100
15%
Value17.0 s
4/100
10%
173 ms
513 ms
160 ms
31 ms
237 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Geepawhill.org, 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (978 ms) belongs to the original domain Geepawhill.org.
Page size can be reduced by 262.2 kB (16%)
1.6 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Geepawhill.org main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 785.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 192.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 192.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 359 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gee Paw Hill images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 34.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 34.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Geepawhill.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 34.7 kB or 16% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (83%)
53
9
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gee Paw Hill. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
geepawhill.org
173 ms
www.geepawhill.org
513 ms
frontend.min.css
160 ms
css
31 ms
style.min.css
237 ms
latest.css
244 ms
astra-addon-659d5ddf03da61-97705437.css
250 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
250 ms
custom-frontend.min.css
330 ms
swiper.min.css
252 ms
post-6091.css
314 ms
custom-pro-frontend.min.css
482 ms
post-5711.css
326 ms
css
31 ms
fontawesome.min.css
407 ms
solid.min.css
335 ms
jquery.min.js
396 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
410 ms
mailpoet-public.6d11f60f.css
348 ms
css
18 ms
css
17 ms
css
21 ms
frontend.min.js
415 ms
coblocks-animation.js
550 ms
tiny-swiper.js
550 ms
coblocks-tinyswiper-initializer.js
551 ms
astra-addon-659d5ddf04ab20-80781337.js
552 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
612 ms
public.js
613 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
613 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
613 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
613 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
613 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
649 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
649 ms
hooks.min.js
648 ms
i18n.min.js
670 ms
frontend.min.js
669 ms
waypoints.min.js
669 ms
core.min.js
978 ms
frontend.min.js
977 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
977 ms
lHoOUylvfxQ
173 ms
geepaw-square-50x50-03-40x40.png
482 ms
gphlogo0066cc-100x42.png
487 ms
mmmss-single-step.png
617 ms
Screen-Shot-2019-11-11-at-4.35.05-PM.png
679 ms
Screen-Shot-2019-11-11-at-4.35.05-PM-1024x552.png
679 ms
rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwARZtRSW3w.woff
61 ms
rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwAkJxRSW3w.woff
62 ms
astra.woff
497 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
498 ms
www-player.css
57 ms
www-embed-player.js
78 ms
base.js
109 ms
ad_status.js
205 ms
QaMcj-JulTnv9WX-ZKiswnw1NZ6KstGU-WkCl6294a4.js
169 ms
embed.js
63 ms
id
49 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
38 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
45 ms
geepawhill.org accessibility score
geepawhill.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
geepawhill.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Geepawhill.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Geepawhill.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
geepawhill.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gee Paw Hill. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: