5.9 sec in total
2.4 sec
3.4 sec
136 ms
Visit gemblock.com now to see the best up-to-date Gemblock content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gemblock.com
Visit gemblock.comWe analyzed Gemblock.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.4 sec and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
gemblock.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value6.5 s
9/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value1,910 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value7.2 s
51/100
10%
2445 ms
167 ms
178 ms
192 ms
211 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Gemblock.com, 11% (4 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Gemblock.com.
Page size can be reduced by 642.1 kB (61%)
1.1 MB
411.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Gemblock.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 464.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.7 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gemblock images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 227.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 227.9 kB or 58% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 382.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gemblock.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 382.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (68%)
31
10
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gemblock. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gemblock.com
2445 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
167 ms
styles.css
178 ms
simple-line-icons.css
192 ms
style.css
211 ms
css
15 ms
css
27 ms
min.css
318 ms
style.css
216 ms
style.css
289 ms
style.css
267 ms
style.css
271 ms
style.css
292 ms
jquery.js
458 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
343 ms
main.js
357 ms
scripts.js
399 ms
min.js
543 ms
wp-embed.min.js
398 ms
pw_maze_white.png
216 ms
voice_banner_300x250_2.jpg
365 ms
instagram.jpg
360 ms
voice_demo_v2_logo.png
201 ms
voice_default.jpg
359 ms
XsEMu5UCy0g
119 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
5 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xONSK5BxN3NFS4EJkViHIqo.woff
11 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
288 ms
socicon.woff
288 ms
www-player-vflMqr8uC.css
4 ms
www-embed-player.js
38 ms
base.js
54 ms
id
69 ms
2tj_Yt5eAEN1YazL-za5nq2m-sVEuK50_GPDTIKqlPM.js
70 ms
ad_status.js
68 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
57 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
60 ms
watermark_ringo-vflPWbiPS.png
61 ms
gemblock.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
gemblock.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
gemblock.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gemblock.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Gemblock.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gemblock.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gemblock. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: