5.2 sec in total
1.1 sec
3.8 sec
353 ms
Welcome to genepa.com homepage info - get ready to check Genepa best content for Japan right away, or after learning these important things about genepa.com
株式会社ジェネレーションパスでは「いいもの」を創造する企業や人と、それを必要とする人や企業への懸け橋に
Visit genepa.comWe analyzed Genepa.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
genepa.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value14.6 s
0/100
25%
Value9.3 s
13/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value10.2 s
25/100
10%
1102 ms
414 ms
424 ms
1561 ms
1830 ms
Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Genepa.com, 11% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Xj-storage.jp. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Genepa.com.
Page size can be reduced by 134.8 kB (46%)
294.2 kB
159.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Genepa.com main page is 294.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 120.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.0 kB, which is 58% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.8 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Genepa images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 67.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 67.6 kB or 56% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Genepa.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 37.8 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (27%)
26
19
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Genepa. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
genepa.com
1102 ms
reset.css
414 ms
common.css
424 ms
layout.css
1561 ms
jquery.js
1830 ms
cmn.js
434 ms
ir.css
642 ms
jquery.min.js
647 ms
XjStorageLoaderTopNews.js
884 ms
ga.js
115 ms
add-sidebanner.html
221 ms
17001981_01_75_JP.gif
610 ms
GetList.aspx
810 ms
site_logo.gif
211 ms
main.jpg
1139 ms
line01.jpg
211 ms
bnr_ec01.jpg
219 ms
bnr_ec02.jpg
417 ms
bnr_inquiry01.jpg
352 ms
bnr_recruit01.jpg
419 ms
icn_pagetop01.gif
396 ms
icm_footer-li.gif
401 ms
__utm.gif
41 ms
__utm.gif
51 ms
ico_recommendo.png
417 ms
ico_bridal-dvd.png
453 ms
MYNAVI_OFFICIAL_mynavi2017.jpg
468 ms
icon_pdf.gif
213 ms
genepa.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
genepa.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
genepa.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
JA
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Genepa.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Genepa.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
genepa.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Genepa. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: