7.2 sec in total
1.5 sec
5.4 sec
313 ms
Click here to check amazing Geocatalog content for Ukraine. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about geocatalog.info
Геодезичне обладнання та інструменти: gps приймач, gnss приймач, тахеометр, нівелір, теодоліт, 3d сканер, тепловізор.
Visit geocatalog.infoWe analyzed Geocatalog.info page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
geocatalog.info performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
66/100
10%
Value5.6 s
17/100
25%
Value3.9 s
82/100
10%
Value760 ms
39/100
30%
Value0.104
89/100
15%
Value7.8 s
45/100
10%
1480 ms
306 ms
307 ms
1072 ms
302 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Geocatalog.info, 6% (4 requests) were made to Acint.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Counter.rambler.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Geocatalog.info.
Page size can be reduced by 231.4 kB (55%)
422.6 kB
191.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Geocatalog.info main page is 422.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 183.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 69.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 70.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Geocatalog needs image optimization as it can save up to 70.7 kB or 39% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 87.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 87.1 kB or 57% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Geocatalog.info needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (71%)
66
19
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Geocatalog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
geocatalog.info
1480 ms
css.css
306 ms
notepad.js
307 ms
jquery.js
1072 ms
autocomplete.css
302 ms
autocomplete.js
460 ms
share42.js
155 ms
top100.jcn
382 ms
button.php
538 ms
izbr.gif
152 ms
lock.gif
297 ms
key.gif
297 ms
smart.gif
302 ms
gohome.gif
308 ms
logo.gif
312 ms
cell-background.gif
449 ms
14.gif
590 ms
15.gif
600 ms
16.gif
607 ms
38.gif
613 ms
18.gif
613 ms
19.gif
748 ms
20.gif
893 ms
28.gif
898 ms
29.gif
897 ms
21.gif
906 ms
30.gif
920 ms
32.gif
1049 ms
31.gif
1195 ms
33.gif
1200 ms
35.gif
1218 ms
34.gif
1205 ms
37.gif
1217 ms
23.gif
1353 ms
22.gif
1496 ms
25.gif
1503 ms
26.gif
1508 ms
36.gif
1515 ms
24.gif
1515 ms
27.gif
1657 ms
topcat.gif
1794 ms
3670.png
2410 ms
3566.jpg
2118 ms
3565.png
2111 ms
aci.js
203 ms
3346.jpg
2084 ms
top100.scn
127 ms
ga.js
5 ms
__utm.gif
15 ms
3328.jpg
2133 ms
99 ms
185 ms
2249.jpg
2104 ms
nologo.gif
2125 ms
news.gif
2120 ms
point.gif
2124 ms
img_on_main.gif
2347 ms
264 ms
help.gif
2258 ms
148.png
2446 ms
3.gif
2118 ms
counter
268 ms
1.gif
2415 ms
poll_.gif
2114 ms
poll.gif
2350 ms
match
190 ms
go.gif
2284 ms
88x31.gif
2118 ms
bg_searchform.gif
2133 ms
bg_speedbar.gif
2361 ms
icons.png
2551 ms
geocatalog.info accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
geocatalog.info best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
geocatalog.info SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
UK
N/A
WINDOWS-1251
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Geocatalog.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Ukrainian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Geocatalog.info main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
geocatalog.info
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Geocatalog. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: