8.9 sec in total
2.6 sec
6 sec
277 ms
Welcome to gescis.com homepage info - get ready to check GESCIS best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about gescis.com
Search Engine Optimization (SEO), SMO, Reputation Management, Web Development, Digital Marketing, School ERP Solutions: GESCIS Technologies Private Limited
Visit gescis.comWe analyzed Gescis.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.6 sec and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
gescis.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
20/100
10%
Value9.2 s
1/100
25%
Value6.3 s
42/100
10%
Value190 ms
90/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.6 s
37/100
10%
2609 ms
64 ms
130 ms
153 ms
144 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Gescis.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Gescis.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.2 MB (67%)
3.2 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Gescis.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 96.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 96.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 50.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GESCIS images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 952.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gescis.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 952.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (43%)
81
46
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GESCIS. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gescis.com
2609 ms
analytics.js
64 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
130 ms
Defaults.css
153 ms
style.css
144 ms
styles.css
151 ms
settings.css
197 ms
style.css
150 ms
base.css
276 ms
layout.css
340 ms
shortcodes.css
325 ms
animations.min.css
285 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
297 ms
prettyPhoto.css
350 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.css
411 ms
responsive.css
420 ms
style.css
460 ms
form-themes.min.css
467 ms
jquery.js
551 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
472 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
657 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
615 ms
css
36 ms
scripts.js
578 ms
core.min.js
589 ms
widget.min.js
608 ms
mouse.min.js
750 ms
sortable.min.js
763 ms
tabs.min.js
795 ms
accordion.min.js
762 ms
plugins.js
917 ms
menu.js
847 ms
animations.min.js
855 ms
jplayer.min.js
893 ms
scripts.js
895 ms
wp-embed.min.js
939 ms
forms-api.min.js
985 ms
collect
11 ms
logo.png
393 ms
SEO-Slider.jpg
393 ms
Yahoo-Logo.png
452 ms
Google-Logo.png
446 ms
Bing-Logo.png
451 ms
SEO-Slider-Image.png
518 ms
SEO-Writing.png
559 ms
Social-Media-Slider.jpg
519 ms
Facebook-Icon.png
573 ms
Social-Media-IPhone.png
694 ms
Google-Plus-Icon.png
572 ms
Pinterest-Icon.png
645 ms
Twitter-Icon.png
644 ms
Social-Media-Marketing.png
811 ms
Search-Optimization-Slider.jpg
698 ms
Google-Penalty.png
786 ms
Google-Panda1.png
771 ms
Google-Penguin1.png
770 ms
Web-School-Slider.jpg
855 ms
Web-School-Logo.png
829 ms
School-Management-Software.png
905 ms
Web-School-Responsive.png
980 ms
SEO-Services-1.png
921 ms
Web-Development1.png
976 ms
Google-Penguin.png
1020 ms
mfn-icons.woff
1052 ms
count.js
19 ms
Ethical-SEO.png
947 ms
Technology.jpg
963 ms
Affordability.png
983 ms
Technical-Support.png
933 ms
Complete-Solutions.png
980 ms
Quality.png
941 ms
box_shadow_button.png
952 ms
stripes_3_b.png
975 ms
Get-In-Touch.png
989 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
883 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
910 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
902 ms
Back-Ground-Image.jpg
972 ms
list_check.png
1042 ms
list_star.png
1041 ms
list_idea.png
976 ms
box_shadow.png
1029 ms
top_bar_right_shadow.png
980 ms
revicons.woff
171 ms
gescis.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
gescis.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
gescis.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gescis.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gescis.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gescis.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of GESCIS. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: