Tools & Wizards About Us
gibbonslaw.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

gibbonslaw.com

Gibbons P.C.

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

252 ms

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

222 ms

gibbonslaw.com screenshot

About Website

Visit gibbonslaw.com now to see the best up-to-date Gibbons Law content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gibbonslaw.com

A Proven Approach. Performance. Presence. Pride.

Visit gibbonslaw.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gibbonslaw.com page load time and found that the first response time was 252 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gibbonslaw.com performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

13/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

68/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value180 ms

92/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.9 s

44/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gibbonslaw.com

252 ms

www.gibbonslaw.com

1625 ms

html5reset.css

78 ms

roboto.css

85 ms

general.css

125 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Gibbonslaw.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Pbs.twimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Gibbonslaw.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 887.8 kB (24%)

Content Size

3.7 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gibbonslaw.com main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 101.5 kB

  • Original 117.4 kB
  • After minification 83.4 kB
  • After compression 15.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 34.1 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 101.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 384.1 kB

  • Original 3.0 MB
  • After minification 2.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Gibbons Law needs image optimization as it can save up to 384.1 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 326.6 kB

  • Original 469.6 kB
  • After minification 426.4 kB
  • After compression 143.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 326.6 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 75.6 kB

  • Original 88.3 kB
  • After minification 75.1 kB
  • After compression 12.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gibbonslaw.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 75.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (34%)

Requests Now

74

After Optimization

49

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gibbons Law. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gibbonslaw.com

gibbonslaw.com

252 ms

www.gibbonslaw.com

www.gibbonslaw.com

1625 ms

html5reset.css

html5reset.css

78 ms

roboto.css

roboto.css

85 ms

general.css

general.css

125 ms

developer.css

developer.css

87 ms

binder.css

binder.css

98 ms

libraries.js

libraries.js

388 ms

modernizr_2.6.2.js

modernizr_2.6.2.js

118 ms

jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js

jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js

123 ms

jquery.jcarousel.min.js

jquery.jcarousel.min.js

163 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

161 ms

jquery.custom.js

jquery.custom.js

236 ms

dynamic.js

dynamic.js

201 ms

spamproof.js

spamproof.js

168 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

184 ms

ga-uni-events.min.js

ga-uni-events.min.js

173 ms

P4ANkjU4_normal.jpg

P4ANkjU4_normal.jpg

13 ms

gibbons-logo.png

gibbons-logo.png

46 ms

De-Lorenzi%2C-D.-(300-dpi).jpg

De-Lorenzi%2C-D.-(300-dpi).jpg

115 ms

Dunican%2C-P.-(300-dpi).jpg

Dunican%2C-P.-(300-dpi).jpg

137 ms

Bershad%20-%20Russ.jpg

Bershad%20-%20Russ.jpg

277 ms

WalshK%20-%20Web.jpg

WalshK%20-%20Web.jpg

235 ms

McMahon%2C-B.-(300-dpi).jpg

McMahon%2C-B.-(300-dpi).jpg

63 ms

Lustberg%2C-L.-(300-dpi).jpg

Lustberg%2C-L.-(300-dpi).jpg

114 ms

Murphy%2C-G.-(300-dpi).jpg

Murphy%2C-G.-(300-dpi).jpg

136 ms

Catullo%2C-K.-(300-dpi).jpg

Catullo%2C-K.-(300-dpi).jpg

171 ms

Giannelli%2C-K-2012.jpg

Giannelli%2C-K-2012.jpg

175 ms

Cannone%2C-F.-(300-dpi).jpg

Cannone%2C-F.-(300-dpi).jpg

224 ms

Pascrell%20-%20Web.jpg

Pascrell%20-%20Web.jpg

970 ms

Quinn%2C-M.-(300-dpi).jpg

Quinn%2C-M.-(300-dpi).jpg

294 ms

Torcicollo%2C-P.jpg

Torcicollo%2C-P.jpg

221 ms

Garley%2C-R.-(300-dpi).jpg

Garley%2C-R.-(300-dpi).jpg

269 ms

Janacek%2C-D.-(300-dpi).jpg

Janacek%2C-D.-(300-dpi).jpg

272 ms

Griffinger%20-%20Web.jpg

Griffinger%20-%20Web.jpg

357 ms

Amalfe%2C-C.-(300-dpi).jpg

Amalfe%2C-C.-(300-dpi).jpg

316 ms

Hompage1.png

Hompage1.png

595 ms

Homepage5.png

Homepage5.png

528 ms

Homepage6.jpg

Homepage6.jpg

501 ms

Homepage3.png

Homepage3.png

642 ms

Homepage2.png

Homepage2.png

645 ms

previous-mainstage.png

previous-mainstage.png

560 ms

next-mainstage.png

next-mainstage.png

577 ms

FOR%20WEB%20-%20Mountain.jpg

FOR%20WEB%20-%20Mountain.jpg

647 ms

FOR%20WEB%20-%20IP%20BLOG%20-%20E-Publications.jpg

FOR%20WEB%20-%20IP%20BLOG%20-%20E-Publications.jpg

633 ms

FOR%20WEB%20-%20Newspaper%20-%20Hands.jpg

FOR%20WEB%20-%20Newspaper%20-%20Hands.jpg

643 ms

FOR%20WEB%20-%20Attorney%20Arrival1.jpg

FOR%20WEB%20-%20Attorney%20Arrival1.jpg

830 ms

FOR%20WEB%20-%20RPE%20BLOG%20-%20Blog%20Clouds.jpg

FOR%20WEB%20-%20RPE%20BLOG%20-%20Blog%20Clouds.jpg

687 ms

FOR%20WEB%20-%20EMPLOYMENT%20BLOG%20-%20Magnifine%20Glass.jpg

FOR%20WEB%20-%20EMPLOYMENT%20BLOG%20-%20Magnifine%20Glass.jpg

861 ms

FOR%20WEB%20-%20E-DISCOVERY%20BLOG%20-%20Keyboard.jpg

FOR%20WEB%20-%20E-DISCOVERY%20BLOG%20-%20Keyboard.jpg

841 ms

FOR%20WEB%20-%20BCLIT%20BLOG%20-%20Tiles.jpg

FOR%20WEB%20-%20BCLIT%20BLOG%20-%20Tiles.jpg

696 ms

FOR%20WEB%20-%20Awards%20-%20Hands.jpg

FOR%20WEB%20-%20Awards%20-%20Hands.jpg

830 ms

linkedin-icon.png

linkedin-icon.png

828 ms

ga.js

ga.js

5 ms

twitter-icon.png

twitter-icon.png

870 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

22 ms

follow.png

follow.png

861 ms

Roboto-Condensed-webfont.ttf

Roboto-Condensed-webfont.ttf

898 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

36 ms

Roboto-BoldCondensed-webfont.ttf

Roboto-BoldCondensed-webfont.ttf

831 ms

Roboto-Light-webfont.ttf

Roboto-Light-webfont.ttf

966 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

tweet-reply.png

tweet-reply.png

783 ms

tweet-retweet.png

tweet-retweet.png

821 ms

tweet-favorite.png

tweet-favorite.png

813 ms

BestCompAmerica.jpg

BestCompAmerica.jpg

824 ms

Catalyst2.jpg

Catalyst2.jpg

811 ms

BestPlaces.jpg

BestPlaces.jpg

780 ms

Best%20Lawyers%20Best%20Law%20Firms.jpg

Best%20Lawyers%20Best%20Law%20Firms.jpg

809 ms

Innovations.jpg

Innovations.jpg

772 ms

WILEF_Seal_060611_Final_Blue.jpg

WILEF_Seal_060611_Final_Blue.jpg

770 ms

Midsize.jpg

Midsize.jpg

779 ms

Philly%20Business%20Journal%20Best%20Places%20to%20Work%202008.jpg

Philly%20Business%20Journal%20Best%20Places%20to%20Work%202008.jpg

801 ms

search-bar-repeat.png

search-bar-repeat.png

778 ms

drop-shadow.png

drop-shadow.png

726 ms

sprite.png

sprite.png

590 ms

awards-background.png

awards-background.png

566 ms

print.css

print.css

77 ms

Accessibility Review

gibbonslaw.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

gibbonslaw.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

gibbonslaw.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gibbonslaw.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Gibbonslaw.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gibbonslaw.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gibbons Law. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: