9.7 sec in total
1.8 sec
7.5 sec
297 ms
Click here to check amazing GIDB content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gidb.org
Gujarat Infrastructure Development Board
Visit gidb.orgWe analyzed Gidb.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 7.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
gidb.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.0 s
0/100
10%
Value19.8 s
0/100
25%
Value23.9 s
0/100
10%
Value970 ms
28/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value25.7 s
0/100
10%
1828 ms
830 ms
633 ms
419 ms
420 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Gidb.org, 6% (5 requests) were made to Translate.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Gidb.org.
Page size can be reduced by 513.0 kB (36%)
1.4 MB
916.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Gidb.org main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 688.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 79.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GIDB images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 269.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 269.8 kB or 57% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 146.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gidb.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 146.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (38%)
77
48
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GIDB. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gidb.org
1828 ms
bootstrap.css
830 ms
style.css
633 ms
responsive.css
419 ms
responsive-tabs.css
420 ms
css
27 ms
flexy-menu.css
420 ms
logo.png
414 ms
blue.jpg
526 ms
purple.jpg
545 ms
gray.jpg
526 ms
orange.jpg
614 ms
font-i.jpg
709 ms
font-r.jpg
728 ms
font-d.jpg
728 ms
201512913563295.jpg
1569 ms
2015129135715443.jpg
1231 ms
2015129135729616.jpg
1421 ms
2015129135741632.jpg
1642 ms
2015129140355.jpg
1587 ms
201512914021798.jpg
1744 ms
201512914037609.jpg
1650 ms
201512914052580.jpg
1856 ms
201512914243459.jpg
1965 ms
201512914256403.jpg
2005 ms
20151291437786.jpg
2052 ms
201512914319371.jpg
2072 ms
20151291444786.jpg
2154 ms
201512914510829.jpg
2393 ms
201512914524804.jpg
2380 ms
201512914538831.jpg
2215 ms
201512914621169.jpg
2471 ms
201512914635759.jpg
2290 ms
201512914647823.jpg
2606 ms
20151291471639.jpg
2497 ms
201512914743154.jpg
2519 ms
201512914759616.jpg
2669 ms
jquery.min.js
48 ms
element.js
55 ms
top-menu-scroll.js
2487 ms
bootstrap.min.js
2472 ms
flexy-menu.js
2674 ms
fswit.js
2678 ms
jquery.responsiveTabs.js
2412 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
2503 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js
2368 ms
facescroll.js
2375 ms
scrolling.js
2481 ms
all-script2.js
2492 ms
QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
39 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
41 ms
responsiveslides.js
2426 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
2397 ms
jquery.easy-ticker.js
2383 ms
extra.js
2405 ms
jquery.marquee.js
1995 ms
201512914811302.jpg
2295 ms
201512914822764.jpg
2147 ms
img2.jpg
2129 ms
img3.jpg
2075 ms
img4.jpg
2067 ms
img5.jpg
1974 ms
img6.jpg
2019 ms
w3c.png
1752 ms
bg.jpg
2523 ms
arrow3.png
1821 ms
arrow2-blue.png
1797 ms
goto-top.png
1721 ms
translateelement.css
52 ms
main.js
485 ms
menudrop.png
444 ms
element_main.js
45 ms
translate_24dp.png
66 ms
l
71 ms
cleardot.gif
50 ms
te_ctrl3.gif
12 ms
gray.css
369 ms
purple.css
238 ms
orange.css
406 ms
blue.css
359 ms
gidb.org accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
gidb.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
gidb.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gidb.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gidb.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gidb.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of GIDB. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: