7.1 sec in total
753 ms
6 sec
309 ms
Visit gidtalk.ru now to see the best up-to-date Gid Talk content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gidtalk.ru
Уютный SEO-форум вебмастеров, оптимизаторов и блоггеров
Visit gidtalk.ruWe analyzed Gidtalk.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 753 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
gidtalk.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
70/100
10%
Value3.7 s
58/100
25%
Value7.9 s
23/100
10%
Value1,900 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.158
73/100
15%
Value11.5 s
18/100
10%
753 ms
249 ms
998 ms
284 ms
2307 ms
Our browser made a total of 112 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Gidtalk.ru, 9% (10 requests) were made to Sync.botscanner.com and 5% (6 requests) were made to Acint.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Gidtalk.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 305.3 kB (67%)
454.4 kB
149.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Gidtalk.ru main page is 454.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 295.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 117.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 117.0 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 821 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gid Talk images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 186.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 186.0 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gidtalk.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 67 (70%)
96
29
The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gid Talk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
gidtalk.ru
753 ms
vbulletin_important.css
249 ms
yahoo-dom-event.js
998 ms
connection-min.js
284 ms
vbulletin_global.js
2307 ms
vbulletin_menu.js
372 ms
adsbygoogle.js
7 ms
vbulletin_md5.js
423 ms
widget.js
347 ms
vbulletin_read_marker.js
490 ms
informer.js
362 ms
top100.jcn
372 ms
logogidtalk.gif
291 ms
88x31_11.gif
485 ms
navbits_start.gif
144 ms
cat_left.gif
134 ms
collapse_tcat.gif
133 ms
cat_right.gif
134 ms
forum_old.gif
134 ms
subforum_old.gif
157 ms
icon14.gif
251 ms
lastpost.gif
250 ms
icon4.gif
251 ms
tk.gif
829 ms
subforum_link.gif
280 ms
collapse_thead.gif
312 ms
whos_online.gif
374 ms
stats.gif
373 ms
forum_new.gif
373 ms
cron.php
476 ms
seopult.gif
296 ms
rotaban.js
331 ms
ca-pub-1215074791261169.js
121 ms
zrt_lookup.html
105 ms
show_ads_impl.js
45 ms
cat_back.gif
445 ms
menu_open.gif
461 ms
gradient_thead.gif
433 ms
ads
252 ms
misc.php
599 ms
misc.php
691 ms
misc.php
756 ms
osd.js
29 ms
widgets.js
89 ms
long-arrow.gif
107 ms
gradient_tfoot.gif
493 ms
arrow.gif
188 ms
watch.js
183 ms
ga.js
33 ms
hit
279 ms
top100.scn
126 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
125 ms
watch.js
1998 ms
b0ba71d68cdc48c885bde7e5cefc1183.js
258 ms
aci.js
207 ms
stat.php
404 ms
css
77 ms
m_js_controller.js
41 ms
abg.js
43 ms
follow_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.ru.html
49 ms
tweet_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.ru.html
105 ms
nessie_icon_thin_arrow_big_white.png
37 ms
s
28 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
70 ms
x_button_blue2.svg
19 ms
MdyApZkAHG2-UELdOwjNjjFZXSz-CGj4o1JtDR7aGgs.js
5 ms
PuwvqkdbcqU-fCZ9Ed-b7RsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
66 ms
98 ms
192 ms
imp.gif
266 ms
10a091f2-51a1-4a54-89a8-2bf3e9df668b.jpg
236 ms
save_c.php
183 ms
imp.gif
262 ms
imp.gif
265 ms
imp.gif
265 ms
jot.html
29 ms
269 ms
cnysSP
9 ms
sync
196 ms
cm.gif
320 ms
track.js
170 ms
cnysSP
4 ms
post_old.gif
127 ms
match
97 ms
counter
312 ms
track.js
287 ms
swfobject_src.js
83 ms
match
195 ms
match
97 ms
track.gif
196 ms
CollectSync
86 ms
botscanner
208 ms
20.js
165 ms
sync
184 ms
botscanner
186 ms
match
198 ms
geronimo.min.js
1702 ms
noreply
91 ms
88 ms
pixel.gif
99 ms
394 ms
botscanner
107 ms
86 ms
95 ms
activeview
18 ms
pixel
81 ms
86 ms
359 ms
advert.gif
91 ms
1
91 ms
ui
41 ms
gidtalk.ru accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
gidtalk.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
gidtalk.ru SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
RU
RU
WINDOWS-1251
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gidtalk.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gidtalk.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
gidtalk.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gid Talk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: