Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    35% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 39% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    53% of websites

giganima.net

Giganima Site - Giganima Assistir Online PC - Giganima

Page Load Speed

6.1 sec in total

First Response

1.6 sec

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

573 ms

giganima.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Giganima content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about giganima.net

Giganima Site Conteúdo de Animes Atualizado Diariamente , Giganima sua Diversão é Garantida veja seus Animes Preferidos de Graça

Visit giganima.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Giganima.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

giganima.net performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.4 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value25,030 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value36.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

giganima.net

1635 ms

webfont.js

63 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

80 ms

style.min.css

100 ms

cookie-law-info-public.css

98 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 36% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Giganima.net, 13% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to C.adsco.re. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Giganima.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 226.4 kB (10%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Giganima.net main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 55.3 kB

  • Original 73.6 kB
  • After minification 65.8 kB
  • After compression 18.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.7 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.3 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 134.4 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Giganima images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 34.4 kB

  • Original 118.9 kB
  • After minification 118.2 kB
  • After compression 84.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 34.4 kB or 29% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 28.1 kB
  • After minification 28.1 kB
  • After compression 25.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Giganima.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (56%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

26

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Giganima. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

giganima.net accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

giganima.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

giganima.net SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    PT

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Giganima.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Portuguese language. Our system also found out that Giganima.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Giganima. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: