Tools & Wizards About Us
gilhyatt.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 88

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

gilhyatt.com

Florida Construction Jobs ::. Gil Hyatt Construction .::

Page Load Speed

699 ms in total

First Response

141 ms

Resources Loaded

469 ms

Page Rendered

89 ms

gilhyatt.com screenshot

About Website

Visit gilhyatt.com now to see the best up-to-date Gil Hyatt content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gilhyatt.com

Commercial construction Jobs. A Leading builder in South Florida. We are hiring construction workers.

Visit gilhyatt.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gilhyatt.com page load time and found that the first response time was 141 ms and then it took 558 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gilhyatt.com performance score

88

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

56/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.6 s

91/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gilhyatt.com

141 ms

analytics.js

10 ms

style.css

65 ms

collect

34 ms

js

61 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Gilhyatt.com, 11% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (258 ms) belongs to the original domain Gilhyatt.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 40.3 kB (46%)

Content Size

87.4 kB

After Optimization

47.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gilhyatt.com main page is 87.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 52.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 8.2 kB

  • Original 10.8 kB
  • After minification 7.7 kB
  • After compression 2.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.2 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.2 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 22.7 kB
  • After minification 22.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gil Hyatt images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 52.9 kB
  • After minification 52.9 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 120 B

  • Original 961 B
  • After minification 961 B
  • After compression 841 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gilhyatt.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 120 B or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (28%)

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gil Hyatt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gilhyatt.com

gilhyatt.com

141 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

10 ms

style.css

style.css

65 ms

collect

collect

34 ms

js

js

61 ms

gradient.jpg

gradient.jpg

86 ms

top_grain.jpg

top_grain.jpg

133 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

132 ms

gradient_top.jpg

gradient_top.jpg

135 ms

headertab.gif

headertab.gif

135 ms

dash.gif

dash.gif

133 ms

dash2_r2_c1.gif

dash2_r2_c1.gif

131 ms

indeximage1.gif

indeximage1.gif

203 ms

news_r1_c1.gif

news_r1_c1.gif

204 ms

news_r2_c2.gif

news_r2_c2.gif

203 ms

featured%20property.jpg

featured%20property.jpg

258 ms

motto.gif

motto.gif

258 ms

gradient_horizontal.jpg

gradient_horizontal.jpg

203 ms

footertab.gif

footertab.gif

256 ms

Accessibility Review

gilhyatt.com accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

gilhyatt.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

gilhyatt.com SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gilhyatt.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gilhyatt.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

gilhyatt.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gil Hyatt. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: