2.3 sec in total
185 ms
1.6 sec
500 ms
Visit gimp.org now to see the best up-to-date GIMP content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gimp.org
Visit gimp.orgWe analyzed Gimp.org page load time and found that the first response time was 185 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
gimp.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
48/100
10%
Value8.3 s
2/100
25%
Value3.0 s
93/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.14
79/100
15%
Value5.5 s
70/100
10%
185 ms
239 ms
119 ms
120 ms
181 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Gimp.org, 5% (2 requests) were made to Button.flattr.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Static.flattr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (927 ms) belongs to the original domain Gimp.org.
Page size can be reduced by 111.0 kB (10%)
1.1 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Gimp.org main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 986.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.8 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GIMP images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 10.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 10.4 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 74.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gimp.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 74.3 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (14%)
35
30
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GIMP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gimp.org
185 ms
www.gimp.org
239 ms
normalize.css
119 ms
grid.css
120 ms
gimp.css
181 ms
font-awesome.min.css
182 ms
home.css
123 ms
push-menu.js
122 ms
load.js
46 ms
wilbericon.svg
173 ms
flattr-badge-large.png
117 ms
cotton.jpg
403 ms
20banner.svg
181 ms
wilber-big.png
245 ms
oldfrontsplash.jpg
187 ms
dot.jpg
558 ms
2010-01-dragon-revoy.jpg
618 ms
gwi_5.jpg
524 ms
gimplayer.png
368 ms
200px-Scribus_logo.svg.png
422 ms
Inkscape_Logo.svg.png
598 ms
swatchbooker.png
576 ms
blocks.svg
654 ms
loader.js
7 ms
open-sans-v13-latin-600.woff
666 ms
open-sans-v13-latin-regular.woff
715 ms
open-sans-v13-latin-300.woff
717 ms
leaguegothic-regular-webfont.woff
748 ms
ostrich-sans-rounded.woff
700 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
909 ms
questrial-v6-latin-regular.woff
838 ms
cc-icons.ttf
816 ms
open-sans-v13-latin-italic.woff
877 ms
open-sans-v13-latin-300italic.woff
894 ms
open-sans-v13-latin-600italic.woff
927 ms
255 ms
button.css
743 ms
button.js
631 ms
gimp.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
gimp.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
gimp.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gimp.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gimp.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gimp.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of GIMP. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: