6.9 sec in total
743 ms
6 sec
211 ms
Click here to check amazing Gipper content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gipper.ru
Поиск и продвижение товаров в интернет магазинах России. Большой выбор товаров из популярных интернет магазинов - gipper.ru
Visit gipper.ruWe analyzed Gipper.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 743 ms and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
gipper.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
60/100
10%
Value2.7 s
85/100
25%
Value5.8 s
50/100
10%
Value9,120 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.04
99/100
15%
Value14.8 s
8/100
10%
743 ms
476 ms
2242 ms
781 ms
781 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Gipper.ru, 6% (4 requests) were made to Acint.net and 4% (3 requests) were made to W.uptolike.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Gipper.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 270.6 kB (39%)
695.7 kB
425.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Gipper.ru main page is 695.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 361.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 73.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.4 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gipper images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 112.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 112.8 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 77.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gipper.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 77.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (55%)
65
29
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gipper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gipper.ru
743 ms
main.css
476 ms
Thickbox.css
2242 ms
SpecBox.css
781 ms
RedirectBox.css
781 ms
dspl.css
1623 ms
showhide.js
2087 ms
jquery.js
2689 ms
Thickbox.js
991 ms
SpecBox.js
975 ms
RedirectBox.js
1098 ms
json.js
1099 ms
ss.js
1223 ms
carousel.css
1224 ms
jquery.carousel.js
1317 ms
general.js
1322 ms
use.css
1497 ms
gipperImageEffect.js
1527 ms
zp.js
1281 ms
compare.gif
132 ms
my_prod.gif
94 ms
logo.gif
100 ms
ajax-loader.gif
100 ms
arr_left.png
99 ms
9.png
962 ms
1.png
968 ms
4.png
631 ms
5.png
1060 ms
2.png
633 ms
6.png
2229 ms
arr_right.png
865 ms
161349.jpg
873 ms
24699.jpg
977 ms
162043.jpg
976 ms
123680.jpg
1327 ms
btn_addgoods.gif
1062 ms
ftr_btn_placegoods.gif
1068 ms
twitter.jpg
1071 ms
dots6.gif
1308 ms
top_n_c.gif
1309 ms
top_n_bg.gif
1310 ms
top_n_r.gif
1311 ms
top_n_btn.gif
1575 ms
top_s_bg.gif
1575 ms
top_s_l.gif
1581 ms
top_s_label.gif
1581 ms
top_s_r.gif
1581 ms
top_s_btn.gif
1710 ms
slide_bg.jpg
1655 ms
btn_compare.gif
1620 ms
left_n_t.gif
1654 ms
left_n_bg.gif
1653 ms
left_n_sep.gif
1713 ms
left_n_ar.gif
1715 ms
left_n_b.gif
1720 ms
aci.js
411 ms
hit;gipper
427 ms
watch.js
5 ms
cbox_c.gif
1702 ms
ftr_s_bg.gif
1703 ms
ftr_s_l.gif
1787 ms
ftr_s_btn.gif
1786 ms
139 ms
368 ms
hit;gipper
291 ms
505 ms
match
393 ms
impression.html
345 ms
extra.js
344 ms
gipper.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
gipper.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
gipper.ru SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gipper.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Gipper.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gipper.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gipper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: