Tools & Wizards About Us
gito.me screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

gito.me

Page Load Speed

10.3 sec in total

First Response

498 ms

Resources Loaded

9.3 sec

Page Rendered

552 ms

gito.me screenshot

About Website

Visit gito.me now to see the best up-to-date Gito content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gito.me

Gito.Me is a technological platform of CostPrize Online India Pvt Ltd.Gito.me is an omni-channel e-commerce enabling technology platform that allows offline businesses to sell their merchandise online...

Visit gito.me

Key Findings

We analyzed Gito.me page load time and found that the first response time was 498 ms and then it took 9.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gito.me performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.5 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.105

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.0 s

42/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gito.me

498 ms

gito.me

1038 ms

css

25 ms

bootstrap.css

950 ms

style.css

1017 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Gito.me, 15% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Phantom.nudgespot.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Gito.me.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (51%)

Content Size

3.6 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gito.me main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 105.5 kB

  • Original 123.0 kB
  • After minification 117.2 kB
  • After compression 17.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 105.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 78.5 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gito images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 885.8 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 345.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 885.8 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 765.3 kB

  • Original 864.5 kB
  • After minification 671.9 kB
  • After compression 99.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gito.me needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 765.3 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (37%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

29

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gito. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gito.me

gito.me

498 ms

gito.me

gito.me

1038 ms

css

css

25 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

950 ms

style.css

style.css

1017 ms

dark.css

dark.css

754 ms

font-icons.css

font-icons.css

769 ms

animate.css

animate.css

773 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

779 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

1500 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1743 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

2552 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

1809 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

1695 ms

settings.css

settings.css

1757 ms

layers.css

layers.css

2225 ms

navigation.css

navigation.css

2487 ms

functions.js

functions.js

2741 ms

nudgespot.js

nudgespot.js

46 ms

beacon.js

beacon.js

42 ms

ping

ping

77 ms

logo_website.png

logo_website.png

364 ms

ecommerce-shopping-retail-ss-1920.jpg

ecommerce-shopping-retail-ss-1920.jpg

979 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

1709 ms

medzstop.jpeg

medzstop.jpeg

1226 ms

footer_logo.png

footer_logo.png

1022 ms

blis_logo.png

blis_logo.png

767 ms

cs_logo.png

cs_logo.png

918 ms

Home-Page-Launch.jpg

Home-Page-Launch.jpg

2102 ms

preloader-dark.gif

preloader-dark.gif

1647 ms

v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf

v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf

24 ms

nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf

nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf

25 ms

DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf

DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf

28 ms

JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

27 ms

xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12by3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12by3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

25 ms

CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8y3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8y3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

24 ms

bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf

bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf

24 ms

-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

27 ms

font-icons.woff

font-icons.woff

2707 ms

5xAt7XK2vkUdjhGtt98uneLrC4Du4e_yfTJ8Ol60xk0.ttf

5xAt7XK2vkUdjhGtt98uneLrC4Du4e_yfTJ8Ol60xk0.ttf

28 ms

Analytics2.png

Analytics2.png

1751 ms

Features-home.png

Features-home.png

1956 ms

Services-Icon.png

Services-Icon.png

2390 ms

Integrations2%20icon.png

Integrations2%20icon.png

2460 ms

RESPONSIVE.png

RESPONSIVE.png

4937 ms

nudgespot.png

nudgespot.png

2733 ms

ozontel.png

ozontel.png

2841 ms

ezetap_1.png

ezetap_1.png

3179 ms

shipmile.png

shipmile.png

3207 ms

nextwealth.png

nextwealth.png

3479 ms

lined-icons.woff

lined-icons.woff

3694 ms

preloader.gif

preloader.gif

3288 ms

auth

auth

54 ms

1

1

190 ms

avatar32.png

avatar32.png

35 ms

avatar_120_data_uri_upload20160318-13702-2e3ec5.png

avatar_120_data_uri_upload20160318-13702-2e3ec5.png

71 ms

match

match

8 ms

avatar_120_data_uri_upload20160318-32619-1p3i8uk.png

avatar_120_data_uri_upload20160318-32619-1p3i8uk.png

68 ms

match

match

50 ms

Accessibility Review

gito.me accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

gito.me best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

gito.me SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gito.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Gito.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gito.me

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gito. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: