Report Summary

  • 72

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 75% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

glasbau.net

glasbau.net

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

591 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

559 ms

glasbau.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Glasbau content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about glasbau.net

Glasbau-Ratgeber

Visit glasbau.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Glasbau.net page load time and found that the first response time was 591 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

glasbau.net performance score

72

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

51/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

88/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.glasbau.net

591 ms

style.css

330 ms

ga.js

35 ms

path.jpg

501 ms

Glasfassade-copy-MiGowa-by-flickr-com_.jpg

189 ms

Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Glasbau.net, 29% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 29% (2 requests) were made to Res.cloudinary.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (591 ms) belongs to the original domain Glasbau.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 32.7 kB (21%)

Content Size

159.0 kB

After Optimization

126.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Glasbau.net main page is 159.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 100.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 32.6 kB

  • Original 41.9 kB
  • After minification 39.3 kB
  • After compression 9.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.6 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 100.0 kB
  • After minification 100.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Glasbau images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

6

After Optimization

6

The browser has sent 6 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Glasbau. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

glasbau.net accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

glasbau.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

glasbau.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glasbau.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Glasbau.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Glasbau. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: