Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

glimt.no

Bodø/Glimt

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

345 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

539 ms

glimt.no screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Glimt content for Norway. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about glimt.no

Velkommen til vår offisielle side

Visit glimt.no

Key Findings

We analyzed Glimt.no page load time and found that the first response time was 345 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

glimt.no performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value33.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.4 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,320 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.172

69/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

glimt.no

345 ms

www.glimt.no

341 ms

wsi.ashx

286 ms

primary.css

105 ms

header.js

151 ms

Our browser made a total of 217 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 38% of them (83 requests) were addressed to the original Glimt.no, 32% (69 requests) were made to Cache.images.globalsportsmedia.com and 7% (15 requests) were made to Images.performgroup.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Glimt.no.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 582.7 kB (15%)

Content Size

4.0 MB

After Optimization

3.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Glimt.no main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 253.0 kB

  • Original 286.0 kB
  • After minification 227.6 kB
  • After compression 33.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 58.4 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 253.0 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 166.0 kB

  • Original 3.4 MB
  • After minification 3.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Glimt images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 163.7 kB

  • Original 242.9 kB
  • After minification 236.7 kB
  • After compression 79.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 163.7 kB or 67% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (24%)

Requests Now

197

After Optimization

150

The browser has sent 197 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Glimt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

glimt.no accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

glimt.no best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

glimt.no SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NO

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glimt.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Glimt.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Glimt. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: