Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 50

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

glimworm.com

glimworm.com

Page Load Speed

12.4 sec in total

First Response

315 ms

Resources Loaded

11.5 sec

Page Rendered

557 ms

glimworm.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Glimworm content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about glimworm.com

Sinds 2001 helpt Glimworm organisaties met het verbeteren van hun online communicatie. Ons doel is het bereiken van uw doelstellingen online.

Visit glimworm.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Glimworm.com page load time and found that the first response time was 315 ms and then it took 12.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

glimworm.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

glimworm.com

315 ms

www.glimworm.com

2757 ms

wpv-pagination.css

263 ms

tribe-events-full.min.css

516 ms

rgs.css

285 ms

Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Glimworm.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.clicktale.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Glimworm.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (49%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Glimworm.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 64.0 kB

  • Original 74.2 kB
  • After minification 53.3 kB
  • After compression 10.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.9 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.0 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 27.9 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Glimworm images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 811.0 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 866.3 kB
  • After compression 251.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 811.0 kB or 76% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 380.4 kB

  • Original 443.3 kB
  • After minification 367.6 kB
  • After compression 62.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Glimworm.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 380.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (48%)

Requests Now

88

After Optimization

46

The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Glimworm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

glimworm.com accessibility score

50

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

glimworm.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

glimworm.com SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    NL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glimworm.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Dutch language. Our system also found out that Glimworm.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Glimworm. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: