4.7 sec in total
193 ms
970 ms
3.5 sec
Visit glitterandgrace.com now to see the best up-to-date GLITTERANDGRACE content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about glitterandgrace.com
Forsale Lander
Visit glitterandgrace.comWe analyzed Glitterandgrace.com page load time and found that the first response time was 193 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
glitterandgrace.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.0 s
1/100
10%
Value12.5 s
0/100
25%
Value8.9 s
15/100
10%
Value1,040 ms
25/100
30%
Value0.116
85/100
15%
Value11.6 s
18/100
10%
193 ms
26 ms
46 ms
48 ms
105 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Glitterandgrace.com, 16% (13 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 13% (10 requests) were made to 2.bp.blogspot.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (283 ms) relates to the external source I1101.photobucket.com.
Page size can be reduced by 152.0 kB (2%)
6.1 MB
5.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Glitterandgrace.com main page is 6.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 95.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 95.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GLITTERANDGRACE images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 10.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 40.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Glitterandgrace.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 40.5 kB or 74% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (30%)
74
52
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GLITTERANDGRACE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.glitterandgrace.com
193 ms
webfont.js
26 ms
3375562265-css_bundle_v2.css
46 ms
gsearch.css
48 ms
authorization.css
105 ms
3226477086-widgets.js
34 ms
plusone.js
62 ms
jsapi
28 ms
css
38 ms
ga.js
109 ms
gradients_light.png
107 ms
rsz_1highreslogo%25232.jpg
108 ms
icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
105 ms
icon18_edit_allbkg.gif
103 ms
bow%2Btop%2B2.JPG
105 ms
bow%2Btop%2B1.JPG
106 ms
IMG_0165.JPG
102 ms
facebook.png
247 ms
POPSUGARSelectBeauty.png
93 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
67 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
110 ms
fastbutton
118 ms
fastbutton
220 ms
fastbutton
246 ms
fastbutton
236 ms
fastbutton
226 ms
68 ms
stats
194 ms
photo%2B2.JPG
98 ms
bow%2Btop%2B4.JPG
99 ms
bow%2Btop%2B6.JPG
95 ms
IMG_0397.JPG
94 ms
IMG_0635.JPG
93 ms
photo-1.JPG
82 ms
tres+4.jpg
188 ms
sequin+top.JPG
163 ms
Outfit2-34%2Bret_2.jpg
161 ms
share_buttons_20_3.png
36 ms
bow%2Btop%2B3.JPG
61 ms
bow%2Btop%2B5.JPG
95 ms
IMG_0465.JPG
94 ms
tres+2.jpg
83 ms
sequin+top+4.JPG
85 ms
IMG_0696.JPG
82 ms
tres+5.jpg
83 ms
sequin+top+2.JPG
85 ms
sequin+top+3.JPG
82 ms
square.jpg
58 ms
clear.gif
59 ms
twitter.png
283 ms
instagram.png
282 ms
pinterest.png
282 ms
bloglovin.png
281 ms
rss.png
282 ms
email.png
281 ms
bow%2Btop%2B7.JPG
81 ms
IMG_0427.JPG
84 ms
tres+3.jpg
77 ms
tres+1.jpg
78 ms
sequin+top+5.JPG
83 ms
V86VyqXbc09Sss3BPsMj16CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
52 ms
DG8QsMl4cLhwKd7DbhnV6A.ttf
73 ms
S5z8ixiOoC4WJ1im6jAlYInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
79 ms
blogger_index.js
69 ms
__utm.gif
47 ms
default+en.css
78 ms
default+en.I.js
83 ms
rs=AGLTcCNFg9Lxr6A_1qJE1FafaQPPaU_lFQ
74 ms
postmessageRelay
162 ms
count.js
141 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
116 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
113 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
68 ms
async-ads.js
62 ms
small-logo.png
27 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
26 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
35 ms
count-data.js
123 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
18 ms
glitterandgrace.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
glitterandgrace.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
glitterandgrace.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glitterandgrace.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Glitterandgrace.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
glitterandgrace.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of GLITTERANDGRACE. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: