Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 33

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

326 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

500 ms

glitterfly.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Glitterfly content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about glitterfly.com

GlitterFly.com helps you easily customize and share your images with your friends. Create glitter graphics in the blink of an eye!

Visit glitterfly.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Glitterfly.com page load time and found that the first response time was 326 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

glitterfly.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

glitterfly.com

326 ms

www.glitterfly.com

328 ms

reset-fonts-grids.css

27 ms

style.css

35 ms

jquery-1.3.2.min.js

65 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Glitterfly.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (328 ms) belongs to the original domain Glitterfly.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 151.7 kB (56%)

Content Size

271.3 kB

After Optimization

119.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Glitterfly.com main page is 271.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 93.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-94%

Potential reduce by 85.0 kB

  • Original 90.5 kB
  • After minification 89.6 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 85.0 kB or 94% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 73.8 kB
  • After minification 70.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Glitterfly images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 52.9 kB

  • Original 93.9 kB
  • After minification 91.6 kB
  • After compression 41.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 52.9 kB or 56% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 10.2 kB

  • Original 13.0 kB
  • After minification 11.4 kB
  • After compression 2.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Glitterfly.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (12%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

23

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Glitterfly. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

glitterfly.com accessibility score

33

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

SEO Factors

glitterfly.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glitterfly.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Glitterfly.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Glitterfly. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: