3.6 sec in total
473 ms
2.6 sec
532 ms
Visit global-asp.net now to see the best up-to-date Global A SP content for France and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about global-asp.net
Global SP, acteur de référence dans le domaine de l’hébergement. Nous proposons une gamme complète de solutions Cloud pour les entreprises.
Visit global-asp.netWe analyzed Global-asp.net page load time and found that the first response time was 473 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
global-asp.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value9.2 s
1/100
25%
Value8.7 s
16/100
10%
Value1,200 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.026
100/100
15%
Value16.8 s
5/100
10%
473 ms
597 ms
152 ms
231 ms
235 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Global-asp.net, 67% (55 requests) were made to Globalsp.com and 22% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (871 ms) relates to the external source Globalsp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 240.1 kB (9%)
2.6 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Global-asp.net main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 236.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 236.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Global A SP images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 308 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 545 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Global-asp.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (53%)
57
27
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Global A SP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
global-asp.net
473 ms
www.globalsp.com
597 ms
slick.min.css
152 ms
magnific-popup.min.css
231 ms
frontend.css
235 ms
style.min.css
160 ms
misc.css
158 ms
style.css
232 ms
script.min.js
234 ms
js
71 ms
d64cef1683.js
96 ms
icon
46 ms
snippet.js
49 ms
et-core-unified-53.min.css
275 ms
jquery.min.js
412 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
274 ms
slick.min.js
274 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
408 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
409 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
409 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
470 ms
react.min.js
410 ms
react-dom.min.js
470 ms
frontend.js
469 ms
scripts.min.js
595 ms
smoothscroll.js
476 ms
jquery.mobile.js
476 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
478 ms
common.js
478 ms
sticky-elements.js
635 ms
d64cef1683.css
42 ms
font-awesome-css.min.css
111 ms
insight.min.js
105 ms
Global-sp-bleu.png
388 ms
rond.png
160 ms
serveur_dedie-site-1.png
233 ms
qnap-site-1.png
543 ms
Microsoft-pack.png
310 ms
hosting-company-09.jpg
501 ms
finance-illustration-01.png
311 ms
de-1.png
390 ms
Data-center-IT-cabinets-stock-scaled.jpg
697 ms
logo-hebergement-cloud.png
388 ms
cle-en-main.png
465 ms
SSL-et-SSH-L-1-1.png
700 ms
securiser-piratage-1.png
545 ms
FTTH-et-FTTO-1-1.png
621 ms
HPE.png
577 ms
dgsg.png
620 ms
fzrz.png
622 ms
derg.png
656 ms
qnap-bleu.png
698 ms
cep.png
699 ms
frr.png
699 ms
acro-bleu.png
732 ms
gthb.png
772 ms
cdf.png
773 ms
GSP-blanc.png
773 ms
et-divi-dynamic-tb-1794-tb-1582-53-late.css
713 ms
modules.woff
871 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew9.woff
37 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew-.ttf
45 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew9.woff
57 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-.ttf
67 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew9.woff
66 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew-.ttf
66 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Ew9.woff
113 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Ew-.ttf
74 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Uw9.woff
99 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Uw-.ttf
74 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w9.woff
74 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w-.ttf
74 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w9.woff
75 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-.ttf
85 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w9.woff
84 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w-.ttf
85 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w9.woff
85 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w-.ttf
86 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
41 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
111 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
109 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
111 ms
global-asp.net accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
global-asp.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
global-asp.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Global-asp.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Global-asp.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
global-asp.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Global A SP. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: