Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 46% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

goldmark.com

Find your Next Apartment | GOLDMARK Property Management

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

113 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

goldmark.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing GOLDMARK content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about goldmark.com

Choose from a variety Studio, 1, 2, 3 and 4 bedroom apartment or townhome options to rent in Bismarck, Fargo, Grand Forks, Minneapolis and Omaha metro areas.

Visit goldmark.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Goldmark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 113 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

goldmark.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.5 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value9,690 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.9 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

goldmark.com

113 ms

www.goldmark.com

322 ms

css

50 ms

DependencyHandler.axd

149 ms

custom-goldmark.css

138 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Goldmark.com, 16% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Browser-update.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (794 ms) belongs to the original domain Goldmark.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 246.9 kB (24%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

765.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Goldmark.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 671.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-93%

Potential reduce by 204.7 kB

  • Original 219.2 kB
  • After minification 181.8 kB
  • After compression 14.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 37.4 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 204.7 kB or 93% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 24.0 kB

  • Original 671.9 kB
  • After minification 647.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GOLDMARK images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 101 B

  • Original 21.8 kB
  • After minification 21.8 kB
  • After compression 21.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 18.1 kB

  • Original 99.0 kB
  • After minification 93.3 kB
  • After compression 80.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Goldmark.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.1 kB or 18% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (10%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

46

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GOLDMARK. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

goldmark.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

goldmark.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

goldmark.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Goldmark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Goldmark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of GOLDMARK. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: