6.6 sec in total
1.6 sec
4.5 sec
515 ms
Visit goodgood.me now to see the best up-to-date Good content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about goodgood.me
Visit goodgood.meWe analyzed Goodgood.me page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
goodgood.me performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
68/100
10%
Value10.0 s
0/100
25%
Value2.8 s
96/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.087
93/100
15%
Value4.2 s
86/100
10%
1597 ms
378 ms
293 ms
1194 ms
363 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 41% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Goodgood.me, 10% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (6 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Goodgood.me.
Page size can be reduced by 231.6 kB (20%)
1.1 MB
916.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Goodgood.me main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 787.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.8 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Good images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 139.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 139.2 kB or 49% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Goodgood.me needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (47%)
60
32
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Good. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
goodgood.me
1597 ms
style.css
378 ms
css
293 ms
jquery-1.10.1.min.js
1194 ms
sticky.js
363 ms
infinitescroll.js
538 ms
jquery.js
857 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
369 ms
jquery.waitforimages.min.js
369 ms
jquery.prettyembed.min.js
528 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
536 ms
callback.js
529 ms
show_ads.js
389 ms
adsbygoogle.js
371 ms
wp-embed.min.js
485 ms
top100.jcn
505 ms
watch.js
52 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
556 ms
goodgood-png-e1418591646683.png
531 ms
foto-13-480x360.jpg
532 ms
nan-22-e1456830974943-480x360.jpg
777 ms
004-480x360.jpg
777 ms
karaul1-480x360.jpg
778 ms
Anuar-Patjane-Floriuk-Whale-Whisperers-480x360.jpg
878 ms
002-480x360.jpeg
865 ms
hqdefault.jpg
775 ms
barany-gg-1-480x360.jpg
1210 ms
rf-gg-1-480x360.jpg
1209 ms
paris-1920-1-480x360.jpg
1386 ms
frid-gg-1-480x360.jpg
1214 ms
kor-int-1-480x360.jpg
1310 ms
67ce2569c0001bd75b780f1d763f2ed5_L-480x317.jpg
1330 ms
bunker-42-10-480x360.jpg
1646 ms
icon.png
1484 ms
sdk.js
137 ms
widgets.js
231 ms
pkYDSlCHbDnBWPT5PPFFTA.ttf
118 ms
g46X4VH_KHOWAAa-HpnGPi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
447 ms
B85vmdvDILX92ray16e-1g.ttf
332 ms
oHi30kwQWvpCWqAhzHcCSKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
208 ms
Fl4y0QdOxyyTHEGMXX8kcaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
205 ms
ca-pub-1428295574171078.js
405 ms
zrt_lookup.html
413 ms
show_ads_impl.js
192 ms
y7lebkjgREBJK96VQi37Zpp-63r6doWhTEbsfBIRJ7A.ttf
183 ms
dazS1PrQQuCxC3iOAJFEJUKHlodXgisC9y12ja1Qqzw.ttf
176 ms
top100.scn
358 ms
openapi.js
989 ms
318 ms
xd_arbiter.php
302 ms
xd_arbiter.php
682 ms
ads
425 ms
button.71000885400e222c3c0eec823f8f93f0.js
524 ms
timeline.0eae788bc4fdbe9cd3e72dca3bc26358.js
592 ms
osd.js
361 ms
ads
674 ms
counter2
582 ms
syndication
380 ms
714891940366532608
494 ms
follow_button.fd774b599f565016d763dd860cb31c79.en.html
178 ms
3938644442375544542
283 ms
abg.js
286 ms
m_js_controller.js
302 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
231 ms
x_button_blue2.png
34 ms
s
32 ms
timeline.f7130f11be9c2719286897ede16853b9.light.ltr.css
84 ms
j6SDDiQit5YY48GNgPpnCluJgoNCzbKlh5o6eVjReZI.js
14 ms
timeline.f7130f11be9c2719286897ede16853b9.light.ltr.css
101 ms
goodgood.me accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
goodgood.me best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
goodgood.me SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Goodgood.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Goodgood.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
goodgood.me
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Good. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: