Report Summary

  • 80

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 84% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    22% of websites

gr.no

Gudbrandsdal Revisjon AS – Gudbrandsdal Revisjon AS

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

837 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

278 ms

gr.no screenshot

About Website

Visit gr.no now to see the best up-to-date Gr content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gr.no

Visit gr.no

Key Findings

We analyzed Gr.no page load time and found that the first response time was 837 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gr.no performance score

80

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

86/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

29/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.9 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.gr.no

837 ms

style.css

119 ms

framside2_1.png

897 ms

rss.png

227 ms

revisorforeningen.png

228 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Gr.no and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (897 ms) belongs to the original domain Gr.no.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 77.5 kB (13%)

Content Size

611.5 kB

After Optimization

534.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Gr.no main page is 611.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 547.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 15.2 kB

  • Original 20.8 kB
  • After minification 20.0 kB
  • After compression 5.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.2 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 24.9 kB

  • Original 547.0 kB
  • After minification 522.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gr images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 37.4 kB

  • Original 43.7 kB
  • After minification 31.5 kB
  • After compression 6.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gr.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 37.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

8

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gr. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

gr.no accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

gr.no best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

gr.no SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NO

  • Language Claimed

    NB

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gr.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gr.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gr. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: