10.9 sec in total
1.1 sec
9.7 sec
195 ms
Visit graphicbanner.com now to see the best up-to-date Graphicbanner content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about graphicbanner.com
Visit graphicbanner.comWe analyzed Graphicbanner.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 9.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
graphicbanner.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.5 s
2/100
10%
Value13.3 s
0/100
25%
Value13.6 s
2/100
10%
Value230 ms
86/100
30%
Value0.244
51/100
15%
Value19.2 s
2/100
10%
1102 ms
5945 ms
30 ms
302 ms
342 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Graphicbanner.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Graphicbanner.com.
Page size can be reduced by 287.7 kB (6%)
4.8 MB
4.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Graphicbanner.com main page is 4.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 80.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 163.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Graphicbanner images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 23.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 23.9 kB or 15% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Graphicbanner.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 20.1 kB or 18% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (79%)
61
13
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Graphicbanner. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
graphicbanner.com
1102 ms
graphicbanner.com
5945 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
30 ms
style.min.css
302 ms
styles.css
342 ms
buttons.min.css
367 ms
dashicons.min.css
414 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
443 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
487 ms
media-views.min.css
522 ms
imgareaselect.css
550 ms
bootstrap.css
596 ms
font-awesome.min.css
628 ms
style.css
665 ms
scheme.less
698 ms
css
33 ms
utils.min.js
727 ms
jquery.min.js
763 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
796 ms
moxie.min.js
835 ms
plupload.min.js
924 ms
js
50 ms
bootstrap.min.js
957 ms
less.min.js
1009 ms
respond.min.js
2163 ms
meris.js
2166 ms
modernizr.custom.js
2235 ms
css
42 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
2193 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
2204 ms
index.js
2199 ms
underscore.min.js
2205 ms
shortcode.min.js
2186 ms
backbone.min.js
2213 ms
wp-util.min.js
2214 ms
wp-backbone.min.js
2285 ms
media-models.min.js
2287 ms
wp-plupload.min.js
2286 ms
core.min.js
2290 ms
mouse.min.js
2291 ms
sortable.min.js
2293 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
2296 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
2000 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
1961 ms
api-request.min.js
1939 ms
dom-ready.min.js
1891 ms
hooks.min.js
1865 ms
i18n.min.js
1821 ms
a11y.min.js
1784 ms
clipboard.min.js
1758 ms
media-views.min.js
1744 ms
media-editor.min.js
1708 ms
media-audiovideo.min.js
1654 ms
graphic.png
87 ms
Mobile-Phone-icon.png
86 ms
slider_12.jpg
221 ms
slider_21.jpg
254 ms
slider_31.jpg
230 ms
slider_4.jpg
311 ms
slider_51.jpg
350 ms
banner.jpg
146 ms
display.jpg
203 ms
wrap.jpg
254 ms
sign1.jpg
263 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
32 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
34 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
55 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
55 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
54 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
216 ms
graphicbanner.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
graphicbanner.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
graphicbanner.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Graphicbanner.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Graphicbanner.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
graphicbanner.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Graphicbanner. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: