Tools & Wizards About Us
graphicmart.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

graphicmart.net

Welcome to the New Look of Graphic Mart!

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

110 ms

graphicmart.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to graphicmart.net homepage info - get ready to check Graphic Mart best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about graphicmart.net

Graphic Mart - Your source for everything in Automotive Resytling, Digital Media & Sign Supplies. Try our great trade services such as digital printing, design & custom slitting

Visit graphicmart.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Graphicmart.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

graphicmart.net performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

80/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

90/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,640 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.7 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

graphicmart.net

1162 ms

css-54f1ee55521b93f2ba8c119f396d945a.php

717 ms

css-068042e5faad58e5ca9b950e5e62bcdf.php

707 ms

css-89cc33fb30f040de01052d7a9a59c51d.php

710 ms

css-b518d664167dd795248190ff44b8159f.php

716 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Graphicmart.net, 11% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Graphicmart.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 389.6 kB (69%)

Content Size

567.2 kB

After Optimization

177.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Graphicmart.net main page is 567.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 367.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 31.7 kB

  • Original 38.7 kB
  • After minification 31.9 kB
  • After compression 7.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.7 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 22.7 kB

  • Original 102.2 kB
  • After minification 79.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Graphic Mart needs image optimization as it can save up to 22.7 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 25.3 kB

  • Original 59.0 kB
  • After minification 59.0 kB
  • After compression 33.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 25.3 kB or 43% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 309.9 kB

  • Original 367.4 kB
  • After minification 367.2 kB
  • After compression 57.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Graphicmart.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 309.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (23%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

40

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Graphic Mart. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

graphicmart.net

graphicmart.net

1162 ms

css-54f1ee55521b93f2ba8c119f396d945a.php

css-54f1ee55521b93f2ba8c119f396d945a.php

717 ms

css-068042e5faad58e5ca9b950e5e62bcdf.php

css-068042e5faad58e5ca9b950e5e62bcdf.php

707 ms

css-89cc33fb30f040de01052d7a9a59c51d.php

css-89cc33fb30f040de01052d7a9a59c51d.php

710 ms

css-b518d664167dd795248190ff44b8159f.php

css-b518d664167dd795248190ff44b8159f.php

716 ms

js-165de2f7867a08470eede1053a918468.php

js-165de2f7867a08470eede1053a918468.php

774 ms

slim-081711.css

slim-081711.css

9 ms

urchin.js

urchin.js

9 ms

f_logo.jpg

f_logo.jpg

404 ms

page-bg.png

page-bg.png

76 ms

body-l.png

body-l.png

78 ms

body-r.png

body-r.png

77 ms

topbar-bg.png

topbar-bg.png

74 ms

font-button.png

font-button.png

77 ms

header-bg.png

header-bg.png

73 ms

logo.png

logo.png

394 ms

search-bg.png

search-bg.png

187 ms

horiz-bg.png

horiz-bg.png

187 ms

horiz-r.png

horiz-r.png

188 ms

horiz-l.png

horiz-l.png

189 ms

drop-top-2.png

drop-top-2.png

190 ms

drop-bg-2.png

drop-bg-2.png

394 ms

drop-arrow.png

drop-arrow.png

394 ms

drop-top-1.png

drop-top-1.png

394 ms

drop-bg-1.png

drop-bg-1.png

395 ms

store.jpg

store.jpg

395 ms

tsmall.jpg

tsmall.jpg

401 ms

youtube.png

youtube.png

953 ms

z53RJss_Bls

z53RJss_Bls

95 ms

arrows.png

arrows.png

380 ms

col-l.png

col-l.png

381 ms

col-r.png

col-r.png

381 ms

newsflash-bg.png

newsflash-bg.png

381 ms

breadcrumb-tab.png

breadcrumb-tab.png

381 ms

light-module-h3-2.png

light-module-h3-2.png

382 ms

left-light-h3-3.png

left-light-h3-3.png

382 ms

left-light-module-h3.png

left-light-module-h3.png

382 ms

light-div.png

light-div.png

383 ms

light-arrow.png

light-arrow.png

385 ms

light-module-h3.png

light-module-h3.png

384 ms

botbar-bg.png

botbar-bg.png

510 ms

top-button-bg.png

top-button-bg.png

521 ms

footer-bg.png

footer-bg.png

521 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

7 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

21 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

44 ms

base.js

base.js

85 ms

fetch-polyfill.js

fetch-polyfill.js

10 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

184 ms

RIClEgSvFHTtA81nTXvsfYoTFQIX2XHl72z46h1pifM.js

RIClEgSvFHTtA81nTXvsfYoTFQIX2XHl72z46h1pifM.js

146 ms

embed.js

embed.js

39 ms

id

id

39 ms

Create

Create

99 ms

Accessibility Review

graphicmart.net accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

graphicmart.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

graphicmart.net SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Graphicmart.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Graphicmart.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

graphicmart.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Graphic Mart. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: