Report Summary

  • 10

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

groundspring.org

Simple & Smart Fundraising Software for Small Nonprofits | Network for Good

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

11 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

641 ms

groundspring.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Groundspring content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about groundspring.org

Better fundraisers happen with Network for Good. Exceed your fundraising goals, connect with donors & advance your mission using our all-in-one fundraising software.

Visit groundspring.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Groundspring.org page load time and found that the first response time was 11 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

groundspring.org performance score

10

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.7 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,470 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.187

65/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

emailnow

11 ms

www.networkforgood.com

27 ms

jY5LDoMwDEQvhJVyJMcx1GqIo9iAuH1Tuu2H3cjzPHpjwLRhIU7Q2KoWk41hk8QKvEROiVuoa8xCF0h4k8MY9gpIxGYSJYsfgcz6EcH8yDzcQmHftT1g0gazajoBoT77rYyqbt6w_gXA77zw0B36nnPxsNasmF4GkLsUENKdwxmnjthF9qf8gnORSQiq1vWj5Pn-BA.css

12 ms

DcrRCcAwCAXAicSZxFjSEo3kGUK3b-_7TpLOKIvinWNKA5-kYQCpaDcu85xL1kvSno3yv4Jc4r4M9QE.css

51 ms

M9bPKixNLarUMYYydHMz04sSS1L1cjPzAA.js

76 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Groundspring.org, 9% (5 requests) were made to Static.olark.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (305 ms) relates to the external source Static.olark.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (49%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Groundspring.org main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 74.0 kB

  • Original 99.6 kB
  • After minification 94.0 kB
  • After compression 25.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.0 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 270.2 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 771.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Groundspring needs image optimization as it can save up to 270.2 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 419.4 kB

  • Original 657.8 kB
  • After minification 657.8 kB
  • After compression 238.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 419.4 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 305.5 kB

  • Original 365.9 kB
  • After minification 362.9 kB
  • After compression 60.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Groundspring.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 305.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (68%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

16

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Groundspring. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

groundspring.org accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

groundspring.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

groundspring.org SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Groundspring.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Groundspring.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Groundspring. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: