5.8 sec in total
410 ms
5 sec
372 ms
Visit gserve.in now to see the best up-to-date Gserve content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gserve.in
As your digital business consultancy partner, we provide high-end creative and digital marketing solutions coupled with latest advancements in web technologies.
Visit gserve.inWe analyzed Gserve.in page load time and found that the first response time was 410 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
gserve.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value12.2 s
0/100
25%
Value6.8 s
35/100
10%
Value250 ms
84/100
30%
Value0.393
26/100
15%
Value11.6 s
18/100
10%
410 ms
1151 ms
360 ms
183 ms
309 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Gserve.in, 18% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Gserve.in.
Page size can be reduced by 643.4 kB (17%)
3.8 MB
3.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Gserve.in main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 147.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 147.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 492.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Gserve needs image optimization as it can save up to 492.9 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gserve.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (55%)
51
23
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gserve. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gserve.in
410 ms
gserve.in
1151 ms
js
360 ms
js
183 ms
dashicons.min.css
309 ms
to-top-public.css
619 ms
style.css
910 ms
css
306 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
871 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
870 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
759 ms
jquery.min.js
1071 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
758 ms
to-top-public.js
1467 ms
idle-timer.min.js
1429 ms
custom.js
1428 ms
scripts.min.js
1484 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
1430 ms
easypiechart.js
1483 ms
common.js
1483 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
1555 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
1554 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
1482 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1716 ms
fk3qemauyxknkrjtgt5lglb12reerf7z.js
662 ms
js
247 ms
analytics.js
315 ms
conversion_async.js
232 ms
linkid.js
32 ms
collect
70 ms
245 ms
collect
765 ms
render.d26cfa992228f00f13af.js
234 ms
690 ms
GS_new-logo.png
556 ms
marketing-bg6.png
725 ms
GS_home_disp_image.jpg
1437 ms
web-dev-21.png
1307 ms
online-cooking-school-icon-5-color.png
554 ms
online-cooking-school-icon-4-color.png
725 ms
online-cooking-school-icon-1-color.png
725 ms
Proj_thumb_01.png
2070 ms
Proj_thumb_02-1.png
1624 ms
Proj_thumb_03.png
1639 ms
Intriguity_gs_home.png
839 ms
Vikrant-Rawa-1.png
1035 ms
COD_gs_home.png
1228 ms
Meenakshi-Rawa-1.png
1422 ms
Zencom_gs_home.png
1427 ms
Ankur-goel.png
1736 ms
ga-audiences
149 ms
collect
108 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
129 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff
174 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
178 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff
176 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
177 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff
170 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
169 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
207 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff
206 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
205 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVQ.woff
205 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf
206 ms
modules.ttf
1382 ms
widget.d26cfa992228f00f13af.js
25 ms
style.min.css
194 ms
gserve.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
gserve.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
gserve.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gserve.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gserve.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gserve.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gserve. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: