10.8 sec in total
831 ms
9.7 sec
304 ms
Visit guitaranalyzer.com now to see the best up-to-date Guitar Analyzer content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about guitaranalyzer.com
Create Guitar Scale, Arpeggio & Chord Diagrams For Pro Guitar Instruction Publishing and Video Production. Powerful Relationship Database Match Tools.
Visit guitaranalyzer.comWe analyzed Guitaranalyzer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 831 ms and then it took 10 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
guitaranalyzer.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.5 s
1/100
10%
Value10.3 s
0/100
25%
Value27.0 s
0/100
10%
Value300 ms
79/100
30%
Value0.994
2/100
15%
Value25.5 s
0/100
10%
831 ms
92 ms
181 ms
184 ms
183 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Guitaranalyzer.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Pingomatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Guitaranalyzer.com.
Page size can be reduced by 682.2 kB (44%)
1.5 MB
867.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Guitaranalyzer.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 735.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.2 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 95.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Guitar Analyzer needs image optimization as it can save up to 95.5 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 366.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 366.1 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 189.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Guitaranalyzer.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 189.4 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (73%)
80
22
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Guitar Analyzer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
guitaranalyzer.com
831 ms
style.css
92 ms
prettyPhoto.css
181 ms
wp-video-lightbox.css
184 ms
style.css
183 ms
dashicons.min.css
275 ms
desktop_style.css
184 ms
styles.css
177 ms
sdm_wp_styles.css
273 ms
prettyPhoto.css
276 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
268 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.css
268 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css
272 ms
minimalist.css
134 ms
wp_lightbox_ultimate.css
360 ms
wp_lightbox_ultimate_custom.css
359 ms
style.responsive.css
357 ms
style.css
359 ms
style.php
674 ms
jquery.js
616 ms
jquery.external.lib.js
447 ms
jquery.lightbox-0.5.pack.js
464 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
534 ms
video-lightbox.js
448 ms
front_end_script.js
537 ms
sdm_wp_scripts.js
539 ms
prettyPhoto.js
635 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js
622 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
709 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.js
625 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
701 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js
712 ms
flowplayer.min.js
102 ms
html5lightbox.js
881 ms
jquery-migrate-1.1.1.js
723 ms
script.js
927 ms
script.responsive.js
788 ms
external-tracking.min.js
794 ms
wp_eStore_style.css
793 ms
wp_eStore_custom_style.css
708 ms
content-shortcodes.css
709 ms
floating.js
716 ms
eStore_read_form.js
716 ms
jquery.form.min.js
721 ms
scripts.js
794 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
726 ms
superfish.js
727 ms
superfish_settings.js.php
1027 ms
wp-embed.min.js
723 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
833 ms
analytics.js
27 ms
pageglare.png
201 ms
page.png
7907 ms
nav.png
118 ms
menuseparator.png
123 ms
menuactiveitem.png
294 ms
menuitem.png
320 ms
spacer.gif
241 ms
header.jpg
466 ms
sheet.png
607 ms
GasScrShtMovie235x155.png
485 ms
RelationshipChart04%20235x155.png
503 ms
LeftHandFretBrdFngEDor-3.png
700 ms
FingerTypPopup01Mov.png
492 ms
GrnBuyNowBut.jpg
573 ms
postcategoryicon.png
580 ms
posttagicon.png
606 ms
counter.php
213 ms
159 ms
footerrssicon.png
645 ms
collect
12 ms
p.css
289 ms
j.js
386 ms
css
48 ms
next.png
206 ms
prev.png
218 ms
close.png
218 ms
sprite.png
200 ms
ga.js
12 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
pinit.js
5 ms
guitaranalyzer.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
guitaranalyzer.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
guitaranalyzer.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Guitaranalyzer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Guitaranalyzer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
guitaranalyzer.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Guitar Analyzer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: