Report Summary

  • 71

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 82% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

Page Load Speed

631 ms in total

First Response

144 ms

Resources Loaded

487 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

gypsumtogypsum.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to gypsumtogypsum.org homepage info - get ready to check Gypsumtogypsum best content right away, or after learning these important things about gypsumtogypsum.org

Visit gypsumtogypsum.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Gypsumtogypsum.org page load time and found that the first response time was 144 ms and then it took 487 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gypsumtogypsum.org performance score

71

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.4 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.7 s

97/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gypsumtogypsum.org

144 ms

gypsumtogypsum.org

297 ms

amp-carousel-0.1.js

26 ms

v0.js

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 4 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Gypsumtogypsum.org, 50% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.ampproject.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (297 ms) belongs to the original domain Gypsumtogypsum.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 50.7 kB (32%)

Content Size

158.6 kB

After Optimization

107.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Gypsumtogypsum.org main page is 158.6 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 98.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 50.7 kB

  • Original 59.7 kB
  • After minification 54.3 kB
  • After compression 9.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 31 B

  • Original 98.9 kB
  • After minification 98.9 kB
  • After compression 98.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gypsumtogypsum. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

gypsumtogypsum.org accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

gypsumtogypsum.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

gypsumtogypsum.org SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ID

  • Language Claimed

    ID

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gypsumtogypsum.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gypsumtogypsum.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gypsumtogypsum. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: