1.2 sec in total
360 ms
740 ms
101 ms
Click here to check amazing Ltcfp Glance content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ltcfp.glance.net
Visit ltcfp.glance.netWe analyzed Ltcfp.glance.net page load time and found that the first response time was 360 ms and then it took 841 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
ltcfp.glance.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
56/100
10%
Value4.0 s
48/100
25%
Value3.1 s
93/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.069
96/100
15%
Value4.1 s
86/100
10%
360 ms
66 ms
70 ms
9 ms
38 ms
Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ltcfp.glance.net, 74% (20 requests) were made to Glance.net and 11% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (360 ms) belongs to the original domain Ltcfp.glance.net.
Page size can be reduced by 421.9 kB (77%)
547.5 kB
125.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Ltcfp.glance.net main page is 547.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 361.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.6 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ltcfp Glance needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.1 kB or 52% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 90.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 90.0 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 308.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ltcfp.glance.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 308.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (52%)
21
10
The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ltcfp Glance. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ltcfp.glance.net
360 ms
default.asp
66 ms
css
70 ms
bootstrap.min.css
9 ms
style.css
38 ms
glancestyle.css
35 ms
refresh.css
33 ms
font-awesome.min.css
27 ms
rollover.js
26 ms
join.css
51 ms
GlanceClient3.js
52 ms
jquery-1.8.2.min.js
51 ms
bootstrap.min.js
50 ms
script.js
51 ms
logo.png
41 ms
ga.js
67 ms
header.gif
6 ms
clear-btn.png
7 ms
top-gradient.gif
8 ms
Waiting.gif
8 ms
bottom-gradient.gif
8 ms
hdr-for-audio.gif
7 ms
__utm.gif
21 ms
1D_AI14T6X7H5aa5BXWWyuvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.woff
55 ms
1TiHc9yag0wq3lDO9cw0vrO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
60 ms
TttUCfJ272GBgSKaOaD7KrO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
68 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
20 ms
ltcfp.glance.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ltcfp.glance.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ltcfp.glance.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ltcfp.glance.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ltcfp.glance.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
ltcfp.glance.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ltcfp Glance. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: