Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

Page Load Speed

8 sec in total

First Response

131 ms

Resources Loaded

7.3 sec

Page Rendered

549 ms

burnfat.healthdailypost.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Burnfat Healthdailypost content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about burnfat.healthdailypost.com

Visit burnfat.healthdailypost.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Burnfat.healthdailypost.com page load time and found that the first response time was 131 ms and then it took 7.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

burnfat.healthdailypost.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

burnfat.healthdailypost.com

131 ms

boilerplate.css

60 ms

content2.css

88 ms

jquery.js

114 ms

today.js

80 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Burnfat.healthdailypost.com, 9% (3 requests) were made to Track.healthdailypost.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Navd.zandyltd.netdna-cdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7 sec) relates to the external source Navd.zandyltd.netdna-cdn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 350.3 kB (36%)

Content Size

976.8 kB

After Optimization

626.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Burnfat.healthdailypost.com main page is 976.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 486.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 16.6 kB

  • Original 23.5 kB
  • After minification 20.6 kB
  • After compression 6.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.9 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.6 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 13.9 kB

  • Original 486.1 kB
  • After minification 472.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Burnfat Healthdailypost images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 286.0 kB

  • Original 424.5 kB
  • After minification 377.2 kB
  • After compression 138.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 286.0 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 33.8 kB

  • Original 42.7 kB
  • After minification 37.1 kB
  • After compression 8.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Burnfat.healthdailypost.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 33.8 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (42%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

18

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Burnfat Healthdailypost. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

burnfat.healthdailypost.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Burnfat.healthdailypost.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Burnfat.healthdailypost.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Burnfat Healthdailypost. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: