1.4 sec in total
244 ms
961 ms
205 ms
Welcome to hallowood.org homepage info - get ready to check Hallowood best content right away, or after learning these important things about hallowood.org
Visit hallowood.orgWe analyzed Hallowood.org page load time and found that the first response time was 244 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
hallowood.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
64/100
10%
Value8.1 s
2/100
25%
Value6.3 s
42/100
10%
Value460 ms
62/100
30%
Value0.259
48/100
15%
Value10.9 s
21/100
10%
244 ms
26 ms
50 ms
51 ms
52 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Hallowood.org, 13% (6 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 6% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (246 ms) belongs to the original domain Hallowood.org.
Page size can be reduced by 74.0 kB (4%)
1.7 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Hallowood.org main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.6 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hallowood images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 37.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 37.5 kB or 25% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hallowood.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.4 kB or 24% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (69%)
42
13
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hallowood. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
hallowood.org
244 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
26 ms
events_manager.css
50 ms
public.css
51 ms
magnific-popup.css
52 ms
style.css
54 ms
responsive.css
53 ms
font-awesome.css
55 ms
addtoany.min.css
73 ms
jquery.js
106 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
76 ms
frontend.min.js
76 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
77 ms
public.js
77 ms
esteem-custom.js
101 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
105 ms
esteem-slider-setting.js
102 ms
navigation.js
101 ms
wp-embed.min.js
131 ms
analytics.js
9 ms
linkid.js
6 ms
collect
83 ms
collect
82 ms
linen1_seamless.jpg
102 ms
LOGOheader978x212.jpg
91 ms
cropped-Hallowood126a_slider1.jpg
149 ms
Hallowood174_webslider.jpg
192 ms
Hallowood163_slider.jpg
148 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
77 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
246 ms
all.js
16 ms
page.js
46 ms
all.js
15 ms
js
114 ms
sm.25.html
20 ms
eso.Ep5bSEmr.js
24 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
157 ms
like_box.php
100 ms
like_box.php
207 ms
LWbfNRBVLRg.css
48 ms
0nCCeJ0Sjjw.js
74 ms
8ZrPme2EwKH.js
70 ms
6ydLaeSSU1k.js
116 ms
C27gDiAQKjy.js
107 ms
p55HfXW__mM.js
105 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
143 ms
301620404_773408810698379_3921343490884601135_n.jpg
61 ms
hallowood.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
hallowood.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
hallowood.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hallowood.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hallowood.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hallowood.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hallowood. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: