Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

harpa.is

Harpa

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

131 ms

Resources Loaded

643 ms

Page Rendered

2.1 sec

harpa.is screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Harpa content for Iceland. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about harpa.is

Harpa er eitt helsta kennileiti Reykjavíkur og er miðstöð menningar og mannlífs í hjarta miðborgarinnar, þar sem hún stendur tignarleg við hafnarbakkann.

Visit harpa.is

Key Findings

We analyzed Harpa.is page load time and found that the first response time was 131 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

harpa.is performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

41/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

34/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,950 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.6 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

harpa.is

131 ms

harpa.is

14 ms

www.harpa.is

54 ms

gtm.js

70 ms

q1.svg

96 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Harpa.is, 5% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Cookiehub.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (409 ms) belongs to the original domain Harpa.is.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 174.2 kB (13%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Harpa.is main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 174.2 kB

  • Original 221.1 kB
  • After minification 221.0 kB
  • After compression 46.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 174.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Harpa images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 22.7 kB
  • After minification 22.7 kB
  • After compression 22.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (41%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

19

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Harpa. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

harpa.is accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

harpa.is best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

harpa.is SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    IS

  • Language Claimed

    IS

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Harpa.is can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Icelandic is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Harpa.is main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Harpa. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: