Tools & Wizards About Us
harptech.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 11

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    24% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

harptech.com

HARPTECH - HOME

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

180 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

346 ms

harptech.com screenshot

About Website

Visit harptech.com now to see the best up-to-date HARPTECH content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about harptech.com

HarpTech offers both creative and industry standard solutions for you pedal, lever or Celtic harp.

Visit harptech.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Harptech.com page load time and found that the first response time was 180 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

harptech.com performance score

11

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,290 ms

18/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.554

13/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.5 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

harptech.com

180 ms

www.harptech.com

161 ms

www.harptech.com

196 ms

sites.css

79 ms

fancybox.css

77 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 37% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Harptech.com, 23% (13 requests) were made to Cdn2.editmysite.com and 14% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (347 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 94.8 kB (5%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Harptech.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 58.0 kB

  • Original 70.6 kB
  • After minification 68.8 kB
  • After compression 12.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 16.9 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. HARPTECH images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 8.7 kB

  • Original 437.3 kB
  • After minification 437.3 kB
  • After compression 428.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 11.2 kB

  • Original 52.1 kB
  • After minification 50.2 kB
  • After compression 40.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Harptech.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.2 kB or 22% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (57%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of HARPTECH. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

harptech.com

harptech.com

180 ms

www.harptech.com

www.harptech.com

161 ms

www.harptech.com

www.harptech.com

196 ms

sites.css

sites.css

79 ms

fancybox.css

fancybox.css

77 ms

social-icons.css

social-icons.css

98 ms

main_style.css

main_style.css

113 ms

css

css

101 ms

css

css

154 ms

css

css

124 ms

css

css

125 ms

css

css

122 ms

templateArtifacts.js

templateArtifacts.js

145 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

95 ms

stl.js

stl.js

95 ms

main.js

main.js

98 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

61 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

287 ms

custom.js

custom.js

288 ms

main-customer-accounts-site.js

main-customer-accounts-site.js

88 ms

lead-form.js

lead-form.js

87 ms

9136321.png

9136321.png

78 ms

banner_video_848.jpg

banner_video_848.jpg

80 ms

line_5.png

line_5.png

79 ms

anna-maria-15-copy_orig.png

anna-maria-15-copy_orig.png

88 ms

line_6.png

line_6.png

78 ms

anna-maria-15_orig.png

anna-maria-15_orig.png

295 ms

the-grip_orig.png

the-grip_orig.png

122 ms

line_7.png

line_7.png

115 ms

harpsetc_orig.png

harpsetc_orig.png

115 ms

virgina-harp-center_orig.png

virgina-harp-center_orig.png

115 ms

image_orig.png

image_orig.png

131 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiunDZbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiunDZbtY.ttf

228 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDZbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDZbtY.ttf

269 ms

0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787weuxJPkqg.ttf

0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787weuxJPkqg.ttf

342 ms

0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787z5vBJPkqg.ttf

0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787z5vBJPkqg.ttf

346 ms

wsocial.woff

wsocial.woff

17 ms

wlp2gwHKFkZgtmSR3NB0oRJfYQhW.ttf

wlp2gwHKFkZgtmSR3NB0oRJfYQhW.ttf

347 ms

wlppgwHKFkZgtmSR3NB0oRJX1C1GAtNV.ttf

wlppgwHKFkZgtmSR3NB0oRJX1C1GAtNV.ttf

346 ms

OZpEg_xvsDZQL_LKIF7q4jP3zWj_.ttf

OZpEg_xvsDZQL_LKIF7q4jP3zWj_.ttf

346 ms

OZpbg_xvsDZQL_LKIF7q4jP_eE3vfqnd.ttf

OZpbg_xvsDZQL_LKIF7q4jP_eE3vfqnd.ttf

345 ms

Unite_700.otf

Unite_700.otf

266 ms

Unite_500.otf

Unite_500.otf

265 ms

nxe1ajf.js

nxe1ajf.js

276 ms

lead-form-container.css

lead-form-container.css

21 ms

css

css

30 ms

ga.js

ga.js

161 ms

snowday262.js

snowday262.js

111 ms

loading-icon.png

loading-icon.png

82 ms

play-icon.png

play-icon.png

82 ms

gradient.png

gradient.png

81 ms

267447_4_0.woff

267447_4_0.woff

63 ms

267447_5_0.woff

267447_5_0.woff

63 ms

d

d

47 ms

d

d

58 ms

d

d

58 ms

d

d

57 ms

Accessibility Review

harptech.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

harptech.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

harptech.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Harptech.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Harptech.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

harptech.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of HARPTECH. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: