Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

haxton.org

The Haxton Family Homepage

Page Load Speed

545 ms in total

First Response

83 ms

Resources Loaded

358 ms

Page Rendered

104 ms

haxton.org screenshot

About Website

Visit haxton.org now to see the best up-to-date Haxton content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about haxton.org

Homepage of the Haxton's of Dover, Indiana: Our Faith, Family Hobbies and Work

Visit haxton.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Haxton.org page load time and found that the first response time was 83 ms and then it took 462 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

haxton.org performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

97/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.3 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.039

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.3 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

haxton.org

83 ms

toc_images.js

75 ms

toc_table.js

81 ms

Count.cgi

199 ms

dorgalen_left_1farm.jpg

13 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Haxton.org, 2% (1 request) were made to Counter.dreamhost.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (199 ms) relates to the external source Counter.dreamhost.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 21.0 kB (13%)

Content Size

156.8 kB

After Optimization

135.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Haxton.org main page is 156.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 137.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 7.1 kB

  • Original 9.1 kB
  • After minification 8.7 kB
  • After compression 2.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 137.3 kB
  • After minification 132.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Haxton images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 9.0 kB

  • Original 10.4 kB
  • After minification 10.0 kB
  • After compression 1.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.0 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (49%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

26

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Haxton. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

haxton.org accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

haxton.org best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

haxton.org SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Haxton.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Haxton.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Haxton. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: