4.8 sec in total
58 ms
4.5 sec
259 ms
Welcome to haywardflowcontrol.com homepage info - get ready to check Haywardflowcontrol best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about haywardflowcontrol.com
Visit haywardflowcontrol.comWe analyzed Haywardflowcontrol.com page load time and found that the first response time was 58 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
haywardflowcontrol.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
28/100
10%
Value11.1 s
0/100
25%
Value15.2 s
1/100
10%
Value470 ms
61/100
30%
Value0.057
98/100
15%
Value27.2 s
0/100
10%
58 ms
11 ms
109 ms
244 ms
20 ms
Our browser made a total of 239 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (230 requests) were addressed to the original Haywardflowcontrol.com, 1% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Counter.goingup.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Haywardflowcontrol.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.4 MB (68%)
3.5 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Haywardflowcontrol.com main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 229.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 97.9 kB, which is 39% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 229.3 kB or 91% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 85.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Haywardflowcontrol needs image optimization as it can save up to 85.1 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Haywardflowcontrol.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 192 (82%)
235
43
The browser has sent 235 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Haywardflowcontrol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 152 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
haywardflowcontrol.com
58 ms
flow-control
11 ms
flow-control
109 ms
common1_1.css
244 ms
esite.css
20 ms
espot.css
47 ms
espot.css
20 ms
claro.css
21 ms
dojo.js
84 ms
dojodesktop.js
1418 ms
MessageHelper.js
39 ms
StoreCommonUtilities.js
61 ms
modernizr-2.6.2-respond-1.1.0.min.js
54 ms
swipeable.js
55 ms
satelliteLib-820fb8a2c4af99545e259b24699262e2e62cd0d1.js
116 ms
espot.js
58 ms
jquery.min.js
32 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.4.min.js
142 ms
Search.js
63 ms
CommonContextsDeclarations.js
1286 ms
CommonControllersDeclaration.js
107 ms
ShoppingList.js
150 ms
ShoppingListServicesDeclaration.js
129 ms
ShoppingActionsServicesDeclaration.js
137 ms
ShoppingActions.js
154 ms
MiniShopCartDisplay.js
152 ms
Department.js
158 ms
QuickInfo.js
167 ms
ProductTab.js
161 ms
dijit.css
164 ms
commonIcons.css
162 ms
Common.css
169 ms
Common.css
171 ms
Button.css
172 ms
Checkbox.css
175 ms
RadioButton.css
176 ms
Select.css
178 ms
TabContainer.css
180 ms
Dialog.css
183 ms
AccordionContainer.css
185 ms
ContentPane.css
187 ms
Calendar.css
191 ms
Menu.css
192 ms
Slider.css
183 ms
ColorPalette.css
177 ms
InlineEditBox.css
175 ms
ProgressBar.css
174 ms
TimePicker.css
179 ms
BorderContainer.css
177 ms
Tree.css
177 ms
Toolbar.css
194 ms
Editor.css
180 ms
editorIcons.css
150 ms
TitlePane.css
127 ms
NumberSpinner.css
124 ms
claro_rtl.css
118 ms
prettyPhoto.css
110 ms
scripts.js
108 ms
uranium.js
107 ms
jquery.sidr.min.js
102 ms
jquery.dotdotdot.min.js
98 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
93 ms
videowindow.js
90 ms
googlesearch.js
85 ms
jquery.cycle2.min.js
83 ms
jquery.cycle2.swipe.min.js
81 ms
jquery.jcarousel-core.min.js
85 ms
index.js
83 ms
ribbon.css
41 ms
CMC.css
42 ms
Configurator.css
46 ms
iphone.css
46 ms
dijit_rtl.css
31 ms
Common_rtl.css
29 ms
Button_rtl.css
31 ms
TabContainer_rtl.css
32 ms
Slider_rtl.css
33 ms
Dialog_rtl.css
34 ms
Editor_rtl.css
37 ms
editorIcons_rtl.css
38 ms
commonIcons_rtl.css
41 ms
TitlePane_rtl.css
42 ms
Menu_rtl.css
44 ms
Calendar_rtl.css
45 ms
TimePicker_rtl.css
48 ms
Toolbar_rtl.css
49 ms
base.css
33 ms
domButtons.css
39 ms
transitions.css
41 ms
Accordion.css
43 ms
Button.css
45 ms
Carousel.css
46 ms
CheckBox.css
48 ms
ComboBox.css
50 ms
FixedSplitter.css
50 ms
GridLayout.css
50 ms
IconContainer.css
57 ms
IconMenu.css
59 ms
Opener.css
58 ms
PageIndicator.css
58 ms
ProgressBar.css
65 ms
RadioButton.css
69 ms
ScrollablePane.css
68 ms
SimpleDialog.css
65 ms
Slider.css
72 ms
SpinWheel.css
73 ms
TabBar.css
73 ms
TextArea.css
75 ms
SearchBox.css
78 ms
ToggleButton.css
75 ms
ValuePicker.css
78 ms
common.css
58 ms
Heading.css
61 ms
View.css
62 ms
ToolBarButton.css
63 ms
RoundRect.css
65 ms
EdgeToEdgeCategory.css
67 ms
RoundRectCategory.css
68 ms
RoundRectList.css
69 ms
EdgeToEdgeList.css
71 ms
ListItem.css
73 ms
Switch.css
71 ms
ProgressIndicator.css
71 ms
DomButtonWhitePlus.css
72 ms
DomButtonWhiteMinus.css
72 ms
DomButtonWhiteUpArrow.css
71 ms
DomButtonWhiteDownArrow.css
71 ms
DomButtonWhiteSearch.css
71 ms
DomButtonColorButtons.css
75 ms
DomButtonCheckboxOn.css
75 ms
DomButtonCheckboxOff.css
69 ms
DomButtonBlueCircleMinus.css
70 ms
DomButtonBlueCirclePlus.css
74 ms
DomButtonBlueCircleArrow.css
74 ms
DomButtonRedCircleMinus.css
67 ms
DomButtonRedCirclePlus.css
70 ms
DomButtonRedCircleArrow.css
71 ms
DomButtonGreenCircleMinus.css
72 ms
DomButtonGreenCirclePlus.css
68 ms
DomButtonGreenCircleArrow.css
70 ms
DomButtonBlackCircleCross.css
69 ms
DomButtonGrayRoundRect.css
71 ms
DomButtonSilverCircleDownArrow.css
69 ms
DomButtonSilverCircleGreenButton.css
70 ms
DomButtonSilverCircleGrayButton.css
70 ms
DomButtonSilverCircleOrangeButton.css
70 ms
DomButtonSilverCircleGreenPlus.css
69 ms
DomButtonSilverCircleRedCross.css
72 ms
DomButtonBlueBall.css
69 ms
DomButtonGreenBall.css
71 ms
DomButtonOrangeBall.css
68 ms
DomButtonRedBall.css
73 ms
DomButtonTransparent19.css
71 ms
DomButtonTransparent29.css
72 ms
DomButtonTransparent30.css
67 ms
DomButtonYellowStar.css
73 ms
DomButtonGrayStar.css
69 ms
DomButtonGrayCross.css
71 ms
DomButtonRedCross.css
70 ms
DomButtonWhiteCross.css
73 ms
DomButtonGrayKnob.css
74 ms
DomButtonGrayPlus.css
74 ms
DomButtonGrayMinus.css
71 ms
dissolve.css
74 ms
cover.css
75 ms
cube.css
74 ms
reveal.css
72 ms
slidev.css
73 ms
coverv.css
76 ms
revealv.css
73 ms
swirl.css
70 ms
scaleOut.css
73 ms
scaleIn.css
76 ms
swap.css
72 ms
zoomOut.css
71 ms
zoomIn.css
74 ms
IconContainer_keyframes.css
74 ms
Overlay.css
74 ms
Tooltip.css
71 ms
TextBox.css
72 ms
slide.css
74 ms
flip.css
72 ms
fade.css
71 ms
DomButtonGrayArrow.css
72 ms
DomButtonDarkBlueCheck.css
75 ms
print.css
43 ms
transparent.gif
9 ms
loading.gif
19 ms
error_icon.png
16 ms
success_icon.png
17 ms
close_normal.png
17 ms
warning_icon.png
18 ms
tracker.js
539 ms
ico-linkedin.png
11 ms
ico-twitter.png
11 ms
ico-gplus.png
13 ms
ico-youtube.png
12 ms
logo.png
15 ms
ico-search.png
29 ms
fc-banner-1.gif
66 ms
fc-banner-2.gif
86 ms
fc-banner-3.gif
103 ms
fc-banner-4.gif
46 ms
NVACPVCPVDF_Family.png
28 ms
C_PVC_FLV_Family.png
30 ms
Chemfeed%20Family.png
32 ms
LifeStarVS.png
36 ms
InstrumentationFamily.png
40 ms
ZSeriesFamily.png
44 ms
ecp.jpg
49 ms
lsfilter.jpg
51 ms
GFPPBFAS.png
52 ms
BYV_pair.png
57 ms
LifeStar_Family.png
61 ms
ISO%20logo_transparent.png
60 ms
legacy1_1.css
62 ms
bd6j3r2.js
738 ms
bd6j3r2.js
1194 ms
museosans-300-webfont.woff
11 ms
ga.js
26 ms
ico-select-arrow.png
18 ms
hayward_menu_background.png
185 ms
bg-shadow-lft.png
40 ms
bg-shadow-rt.png
39 ms
btn-prev.png
40 ms
btn-next.png
38 ms
museosans_500-webfont.woff
38 ms
bg_80percent_transparent_grey.png
31 ms
30395_Hayward_eSpot_Small_TradeShows_prf6.gif
32 ms
30395_Hayward_eSpot_Small_Markets_prf6.gif
33 ms
30395_Hayward_eSpot_Small_News_prf6.gif
32 ms
RGAUpdate.gif
30 ms
__utm.gif
152 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
blank.gif
13 ms
empty.gif
13 ms
ico-prev.png
11 ms
ico-next.png
9 ms
default.php
139 ms
haywardflowcontrol.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
haywardflowcontrol.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
haywardflowcontrol.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Haywardflowcontrol.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Haywardflowcontrol.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
haywardflowcontrol.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Haywardflowcontrol. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: