Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 62

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

headfield.com

Head Field Solution – RPO, Offshore Staffing, Website Designing, Branding

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

75 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

199 ms

headfield.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to headfield.com homepage info - get ready to check Head Field best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about headfield.com

Head Field has been a formidable player in the outsourcing business market for almost half a decade. We offer offshore staffing services, international recruiter, offshore recruiter, website designing...

Visit headfield.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Headfield.com page load time and found that the first response time was 75 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

headfield.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.3 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

89/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.1 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

headfield.com

75 ms

www.headfield.com

190 ms

headfield-style.css

47 ms

BreadCrumb.css

40 ms

jquery.min.js

65 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Headfield.com, 16% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 15% (9 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (616 ms) relates to the external source Static.xx.fbcdn.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 179.6 kB (45%)

Content Size

398.4 kB

After Optimization

218.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Headfield.com main page is 398.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 160.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 19.1 kB

  • Original 24.3 kB
  • After minification 18.6 kB
  • After compression 5.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.7 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 19.3 kB

  • Original 160.6 kB
  • After minification 141.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Head Field needs image optimization as it can save up to 19.3 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 91.6 kB

  • Original 153.7 kB
  • After minification 141.1 kB
  • After compression 62.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 91.6 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 49.7 kB

  • Original 59.8 kB
  • After minification 47.6 kB
  • After compression 10.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Headfield.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 49.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (43%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

34

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Head Field. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

headfield.com accessibility score

62

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

headfield.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

headfield.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Headfield.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Headfield.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Head Field. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: